On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
as follows : yivecr&ou frequenter poni ~ tur pro twai , frequenter et abnndat . Nostro temen loco virtu te non caret , significans factus . Thus much ia defence of Socinus . —With the
interpretation of the Proem of John ' s Gospel I do not meddle , being contented with the conviction which I feel that the orthodox interpretation is inadmissible . In reading * the excellent communication of Cleric us Cantabrigiensis ^ ( pp . 552—557 , ) I was somewhat amused to find that Dr . Copleston attributes the admission of the Necessarian system in part to the pride of the human mind in refusing to believe that the foreknowledge of God may
co-exist with the contingency of events . What obstinate perverseness not to believe that an event can be certain and uncertain at the same time I But this pride of the human intellect is in many cases a provoking quality . Jt has an unlucky propensity to call things by their right names , and will not swallow a contradiction though recommended under the guise of an " apparent incongruity . " Theologians in particular find it a troublesome thing to deal with . Even though they call it hard names and vilify it with the appellation of carnal
reason , or imperiously demand of it to humble itself before their mysterious dogmas , it remains inflexible . It will pry into secrets which it is assured are above its comprehension , and pertinaciously refuses to admit that two propositions which are diametrically opposed to each other can both be true . When will men of sense
and learning cease to deceive themselves and misiead others by the sophistry of words ? When will they reoiember , or reason as though they remembered , that things will remain the same by whatever names they may be called ? When will theologians especially be sensible that , unless they
cara refute the charge of maintaining . absurd and contradictory propositions , to call their doctrines mysteries , is only to add evasion to the disgrace of defeat ? Jt would be more magnanimous boldly to affirm , that what appears u contradiction to the limited understanding of man , may nevertheless be true . E . COGAN .
The Athanasian Creed at variance with Common Sense and Christian Charity . Islington ,
fern , October 12 , 1825 . r | HHE British Critic is well known JL to have been for many yeai 3 a periodical publication devoted ' to the interests of the Church of England On some occasions it has been candid
but , generally speaking , decidedly hostile to every species of Dissenters . The Unitarians have been honoured with no small share of its obloquy . But it is worthy of remark , that this High Church Review has lately been metamorphosed from a Monthly into
a Quarterly publication . Its first number has just appeared . One of its articles is truly liberal , especially towards Unitarians ; for they are the oppugners of its darling Athanasian Creed . It is entitled , * Sermons on various Subjects , by the late Rev . Thomas Rennell , B , D ., Vicar of
Kensington , Prebendary of South Granthain , and Chaplain to the late Lord Bishop of Salisbury . " His predecessor at Kensington , though not immediate , was the amiable and erudite Jortinand he was the son of Dr .
. Rennell , the present Dean of Winchester . Mr . Rennell died recently in tlie prime of life and zenith of his usefulness , deeply lamented . The Reviewer thus notices and commends his sermon
on the Athanasian Creed ,: u This Creed , which has been the subject of much misapprehension , has also been , we must confess , the cause of some uneasiness ; and certain it is , that if the eminent divines of our church , professing as they do precisely the same belief , should undertake to draw up a formula
of this doctrine suitable to the present day , and agreeable to the mild and tolerant spirit of our church , they would be content to express it in simpler terms and to place it in fewer lights ; and they would either abstain altogether from the damnatory clauses or express the sense of them in such a way as to prevent the
possibility of those harsh constructions to which they have been liable . The fault , however , is not in the learned men who composed it , nor yet in the Cited itself , which , recording , as it does , the identity of our faith with that of the primitive Christian , is entitled to our highest respect ; but in the numerous heresies and wild opinions in the mid > t
£ 06 The Athanasian Creed .
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1825, page 606, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2541/page/30/