On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    tiraat iMrmky , mttch move frimi the jireiisistiDncs ijff ^ vWc lj he was placed , rxrach wheri contrasted with the ^ ood whfch he < Hd ^ > aiid nraehr w&ea com * .

    paced Avith tlie characters of most other heroes . If I wererian English * man , all these things should go to mitigate my fierce prejudice against the former object of i « y counrtry * s hatred ^; but I would not seek assis % *

    ance for the purpose in the vagoe theology of Hannah . Mare . Dissenting- Belh . The remark is so common in America that the English Dissenters are * denied the privfc lege of using bells , that ^ the unce rtainty of your correspondent reapeet ^ ing the law on the , subject struck me with surprise .

    It is singular , on apptoaching Philadelphia , to witness thfe fnflu&nee which original Quaker ctistoiitfs h&ve exerted on the external appear&ttee of that great city . Teh years ^^

    g the only object which ydti beheld m the shape of a steeple ; was ai shot > tower . The silence of a Sunday morning there , too , is oppressive to one who has been accustomed to the

    cheerful clamour whirh , at the same season , proceeds from the numerous &tid beautiful steeples of Nfetv York and Boston . Ben Dmnd on 1 Johnv . 7 * This ver 9 e would nbb be formidable to

    Unitarians , even though its perfect authenticity were established . There is such a thing us moral as well as numerical unity . Lettier of Dv . Toulmin on Socinus * Would not a judiciously compiled and translated selection from the works

    of Sfcei&us , in one volume , be an acceptable and valuable present to the ? theological public ? On the Proem of John's Gospels The writer of this Synopsis has for a long time entertained the views here given of this much contested passage .

    Will the Editor of the Repository have the goodness to transmit to his Penzance correspondent a pamphlet on this subject , fi © ttt htm some time ' ago from America ? It will at least present the interest of a very exact coincidence between the conclusions

    of two distant and entirely unconnected inquirers . Monument to Lindnet /* " That rash atad ^ itfcon ^ tent interpre ter of scriptnm f A "Quarterly Review .

    Untitled Article

    Momic Missidm Atldoei&uB ape * culator ^ Bvtt tiere may at ileast : bb one good tendency ia &ia ^ Wni of arg-uments , viz . AU whereas formerly the readers of the Bible were divided

    into the two classes of believers and coffers , these sew rides of interpret - ing the miraculous facts of the OW T ? mtnm& * t > wfM ^ if tliey prevai l , ^ vide Mne Ivotld afresh into tfte < more harm onio ua and ree < mcileable bodies

    of believers ttt the simple truth $ & that book , end literal believers in its miracles , - •" . - ' * ..: > . - / ^^ j nv Pmtor&l LeMei * vf ^ J 2 r . JE > ^ g& * «; An amusing- document enough for the ^ nineteenth century . I forbear to pkk it all to pieces- -r- * } : ^ z ' £ s \ Proposed Chmtl 4 t Dtirhtnnk Mk

    ofers and good adVicev v < v < f ; Critical Synopsis . Und ^ r-tlte m * tide Poetry , i observe-wi 4 $ t&&i * M the press . ** Falls upon ^ tfeeo ear ^ should have been paUay &c . , : . « . On Ordination Service ® . I titmt the writer does not think it wrang fe to let aa American" review- sth * .

    Repository , I like his English-spirit about tracts . Bat we Americans are glad to get good tracts , from what quarter soever they come . On "Necessity and Predestination *

    A great defect of the writers on btitli sides of this question ^ is , to suppose that their viewfe , lyhen once embraced and Hioroughly ^ ndferstood , # ll re ^ move all the difficulties that enciwflber of

    it . I allow the full ? forc ^ most of the objections whfch thia neat aid ktcid correspondent h ^ brought & * gainst Dr . Coples-toii , but td say-that I see or feel how phila ^ bpbical

    nedftssity differs essentially from the fatalism of the anciently wo&ld be pre * tending to something ; beyond my own experience . The ^ paragraph in wliicb Clericus Cantabrigiertsis instets Bpton a distinction between the two ^ dppeard to me to fall short of te aW . Tbe ^

    point in dispute seenis to * be ilQore than once assumed . Tor instance ; ^ The creed of the Necessitarians when properly understood , incttlcafcea no [ absurd ] practice . " "" When properly understood' ^ is a great peaceadvocated

    maker . The truth is , the of necessity wish fos to receive their arguments as soutid ; but to hiaint ^ ft all along a reservation in our niwd 3 that they are somehow or otlier consistent with perfect-liberty , i ** &

    Untitled Article

    S 24 Critical Synopsis t > f the Manthiy Rep $ sl&r \ j for September , 1826 .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Sept. 2, 1826, page 524, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2552/page/16/