On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    he appeals * trot we must content ourselves with referring to the observations made upon them by Mr . Fox , in his Letters to Dr . Smith , already mentioned . Granting , however , that each tmd all of the few passages which he brings forward , had an original reference to Christ , they do not prove what Dr . Smith alleges them to prove . They may be predictions of Christ without

    affording the slightest evidence that the Mosaic sacrifices were designed representations of his work and office . A prophecy of Christ is one thing ; it is another and totally different thing that in that prophecy the legal sacrifices are asserted to be typical of the sufferings and death of Christ . We are quite satisfied that the passages referred to by Dr . Smith prove no such thing , and we are equally convinced , that if they do not , there is not a passage in the whole Bible that does . " To constitutes type , " says Bishop Marsh ,

    something more is jequisite than a mere resemblance of that which is called its antitype . For one thing may resemble another , when the things themselves are totally unconnected . But it is the very essence of a type to have a necessary connexion with its antitype . It must have been designed , and designed

    from the very beginning , to prefigure its antitype . It implies not an accidental parity of circumstances , but a pre-ordained and inherent connexion between them . " Now in this sense of the word type , we deny that there is anycground for -believing that the sacrifices of the law were typical of the death of Ohrist ; we deny that there is any adequate reason for saying that they were designed and intended to prefigure this event . This denial we make for the reasons that follow . When the Mosaic ritual was delivered to

    the Jews , the instructions respecting sacrifices were numerous and explicit ; but not the most distant thint is ever given by Moses , or by the prophets who came after him , that they were designed to represent the death of Christ . If they had been so designed , if this had been the object of their institution , it is most extraordinary and unaccountable that this object , that this design , should never have been , even in the slightest degree , alluded to in any part of the Old Testament . In answer to this , as it appears to us , very decisive faeL reference : is sometimes made to Hebrews xi . i , where the law is said to

    be a shadow of good things to come . Whatever be the meaning of this passage : , it does not apply to sacrifices particularly , but to the institutions Of the law generally . Of what then were the tabernacle and the altar , and the various utensils used in the service of the tabernacle , typical ? What were they designed to prefigure and represent ? But the plain meaning of this passage , according to Whitby and Spencer , is , that though the law , when we consider the state and circumstances of the Jews , was well adapted to

    conduct them to virtue and happiness ; yet when compared with the sublime andmore perfect dispensation of the gospel , it is but as the shadow in comparison with the ( substance . Against the supposition , then , ( that the Mosaic sacrifices > were typical of the death of Christ , < it is a fatal objection that no such intention , purpose or design , is any where in the Scriptures plainly and explicitly set forth ; and it is equally fatal to this opinion that the dews

    themselves were never led , either by the language of Moses or the prophets , to regard their sacrifices as typical of a future and greater sacrifice . Still more , even the apostles could not have so regarded them , because they did not believe the death of Christ to have been necessary and unavoidable , and hoped , to rthe very last , that this great catastrophe might 'have been prevented . Again , when sacrifices came to be perverted and abased , when an efficacy

    Untitled Article

    478 Remew *~ Dr . •/? P . Smith ' s Discourses .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1828, page 478, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2562/page/46/