On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
the doctrine of the immediate agency of God in Christ , where willH ! Dr . Smith find the person of the Son in the Trinity , when it iss ; plainly declared that such powers were received from the Fatherr as in the following , What I see my Father do , &c * * " The Father that is in me , he , &c . ' ' I have received of the Father :
TheTFather hatrFciDffiffiitted ^ a ^^ it is attributed to the Holy Spirit , as in the passage where Jesus * says , Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven ;" evidently meaning , as the context shows , that the Son of mam did the works by inspiration from God . If Dr . Smith has not ; loosened the key-stone of his Trinity , no argument can shake it .
His chapter on the article may be safely left in the hands of Gregory Blunt , who also will kindly show him how to fit his proofs to a fourth God in the person of Moses , We may give him all the advantage of his elaborate chapter on the Hebrew plural . If the plural was then necessary to express the Deity , so must it be now , and thus , besides the advantage of getting rid of the barbarous unscriptural word Trinity , by saying ' Gods / we may avoid the blasphemy of limiting their persons , as e for any
thing we know it may be one of the unique properties of the divine nature to consist of one hundred persons . Dx . S . tells us , ' that a considerable part of his evidence consists of allusions , implications , and assumptions , '' and * that such , in the interpretalion of written documents , often produces a sense of certainty superior to direct and positive evidence . ' Thanjung him for the concession , let me just examine the force of his position , ' -which is intended to do more than overthrow it . It is very true , that the evidence of
a fact which is corroborated by , and in some cases even founded on implications , may be superior to evidence directly in its favour , where there is suspicion of interpolation or intended misrepresentation ; but in a case ( mark the difference ) where there is direct and indirect evidence of equal authenticity , who can for an instant doubt to which most attention ought to be paid ? What indirect evidence can avail against the following : — - ' . One < 5 rQti and Father of all who is above all . ' c There is but one God the
Father and one Lord Jesus Christ . ' * Christ shall deliver up the kingdom to God the Father . ' * The head of every man is Christ , the head of Christ is God . ' Finally , Dr . S . says , that * No intelligent believer holds that the reception of any truth is necessary to . salvation in itself , or in any other way than its practical influence on * tHe whole moral 1 f
character , and most justly refers as a proof to—because they receive not the love of the truth that they may be saved . ' Let but the orthodox creed be modelled according to this truth , and a glorious step will be taken in Christian professors , and a weight of sin be taken from the souls of those whose * Believe as I dp . or be damned' has hindered many an honest mind from partaking of the blessings of the Christian faith , where inquiry has- been stopped
Untitled Article
• * 272 ON DR . , P . SMITH ' S SCRIPTURE TESTIMONY .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Sept. 1, 1833, page 272, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2621/page/16/
-