On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
and he imagines that Candide was written to support the doctrines which are put into the mouth of Pangloss ! ( p . 289 . ) At the conclusion of his abstract of the opinions of previous authors , which , it is but justice to say , is in general much fairer , and even more intelligent , than might be supposed from the specimens which we have given , Mr . Blakey sums up the result of the examination in the following words :
* All the systems we have examined may , I conceive , be referred to six distinct heads . 1 st . The eternal and immutable nature of all moral distinctions . 2 nd . That utility , public or private , is the foundation of moral obligation . 3 rd . That all morality is founded upon the will of God . 4 th . That a moral sense , feeling , or emotion , is the ground of virtue . 5 th . That it is by supposing ourselves in the situation of others , or by a species of sympathetic mechanism , that we derive our notions of good and evil . And 6 th , the doctrine of vibrations , * and the association of ideas . *—p . 317 .
After declaring that ' there are none of these different systems that are not in some degree founded on truth , ' and that c we cannot resolve all the moral feelings and habits of our nature into one general principle , ' he assigns , nevertheless , his reasons for preferring to all the other theories the doctrine , * that virtue depends upon the will of God / as made known by revelation . Mr . Blakey ' s enumeration is illogical : it confounds two distinct , though nearly connected , questions ; the standard or test of moral obligation , and the origin of our moral sentiments . It is one question what rule we ought to obey , and why ; another question how our feelings of approbation and disapprobation actually originate . The former is the fundamental question ol * practical morals ; the latter is a problem in mental philosophy . Adam Smith ' s doctrine of sympathy which stands fifth , and the doctrine of association -which stands sixth in Mr . Blakey ' s list , are theories respecting the nature and origin of our feelings of morality . His second and third are theories respecting the rule or laiv by which we ought to guide our conduct . His first and fourth involve , or maybe so understood as to involve , both considerations .
These several theories , therefore , are not exclusive of one another . It is possible , for instance , to hold with Hartley ,, that our feelings of morality originate in association , and with Bentharn that our conduct , in all things which depend on our will , and among the rest , in the cultivation of those very feelings , should be guided by utility ; or with our author , that the will of God is itself the foundation of the obligations of virtue . David Hume seems to have combined the recognition of utility as the standard or test of morality , with the belief of a moral sense , independent of association . Paley has no theory respecting the nature of moral * The doctrine of vibrations , a mere physiological hypothesis , which has no connexion at all with Hartley ' s theory of association , ought not to have been , included id mi enumeiation of theories of motals .
Untitled Article
666 Blakey s History of Moral Science .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1833, page 666, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2624/page/6/
-