On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    Bulwer ' s boot , even in matters of fact . For the sake of being amusing , he could not be content to discuss , he thought it necessary to paint . But , for a picture , details are necessary as well as

    outlines : and the details which were requisite for correctly fillin g up the picture , Mr . Bulwer often did not know- This is particularly conspicuous in all that he writes about France . Thus , to take one instance among many , Mr . Bulwer dwells much , and with reason , on the characteristic fact ( a fact connected with many other differences between the two countries ) of the great personal consideration possessed in France by the leading journalists , while in England men are ashamed rather than proud of a connection with even the most successful newspaper . Almost all Mr . Bulwer ' s general remarks on this subject are just and pertinent ; but he must needs illustrate his assertions by an

    imaginary conversation between a supposed editor of ' The Times ' and M . Bertin de Vaux . In this conversation there are some clever traits of satire , but the part which is borne in it by the representative of French journalism must , by every Parisian who reads it , be felt as laughably incongruous and absurd ; the smallest blunder being that M . Bertin de Vaux , peer of France , late deputy for the department of Seine et Oise , is confounded with M . Bertin Vaine , principal editor and responsible manager of the Journal des Debats .

    This reminds me of a most portentous piece of ignorance of the state of society in England which M . Chales displays , in conjunction with a curiously perverse misapplication of a true principle . We are all familiar with that kind of philosophic pedantry , which , when it has got hold of a few truths which it conceives to be a test of superiority over the vulgar , applies them d . tort et & travers , and sees proof of ignorance of them in the bare fact of maintaining an opinion different from its own on any subject .

    Thus M . Chales declares Mr . Bulwer to be entirely mistaken in deeming the position of a man of letters to be a more desirable one in France than in England ; and then favours his readers with a column and a half of observations on the intrinsic worthies sness of the character of a mere man of letters , a writer by profession , a hack , who does not write because he has something to sa y , but who must find something to say in order that he may

    write , and by writing may obtain food or praise . Undoubtedly , this is a character of no great worth or dignity , and the observations of M . Chales on the subject are perfectly just , and the more just the more out of place ; for , as M . Chales ought to have well known , Mr . Bulwer was not complaining of any neglect shown to such literary hacks , who , on the contrary , are almost

    the only prosperous persons among our public writers ; but of the almost insuperable obstacles with which those writers have to Rtni ggle who are not mere * hommes de lettresy * but students , giving forth to the world the fruits of their studies ; and the very

    Untitled Article

    The Journal des DibaU and the English . 391

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), June 2, 1834, page 391, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2634/page/7/