On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
¦ a hiJH '" ttiat " they have stopped tfte ' current , fajl to mark how it IjtSiWally rises above the tdps of ttieir petty dikes till it washes oVfer them , and * at lengthy sweeps them aWay altogether amidst a heap of other impediments .
The Tories were quite right in their assertions that the principles (!!) of ' His Majesty were not reforming but conservative . That ' His Majesty' likes popularity is true enough . Even the Duke of Wellington , the ' drowner of men , ' likes popularity , and so does almost every human being . But to like popularity is one thing , and to like popular freedom is another . A West Indian
planter likes to have merry labourers about him , but he would rather have sullen ones than pay the price of their freedom for their mirth . There is an absurd axiom in England that' the King can do no wrong . ' The meaning of this is , that his Ministers are responsible for his acts ; but what does the responsibility amount to ? That , after continuing in office an indefinite time , and perpetrating an indefinite amount of mischief , they may be turned out df their places by the excited clamour of the people , and the King
ixlay appoint another set to tread , as nearly as possible , in the footsteps of their predecessors . Any rational objection to this tnode of proceeding is met by the temporizers with the reply , ' It id the King ' s prerogative to choose his Ministers ; and that of the House of Commons to object to them . ' The evil of this is plain . Th ^ King , in half an hour , in a lit of ill temper , or folly , or fear ,
Of venality , may do a mischief which it will take a House of Commons six months to undo . The only effective process for stopping a rntechievous and obstinate Ministry is to ' stop the supplies , ' sfttd this act is synonymous with throwing a whole covmtry into tjonftfsion ; and , moreover , when the mischievous Ministry lias been piit o \ xf of office , there is no security that the King will appoint a better . The King wields an irresponsible authority , and this is one of the crying evils of our so much lauded ' Constitution .
The Duke of Clarence , like most of his relatives , was ever famous for a strong money-spending capacity , which constantly led him to Outrun his income . His tastes were far from refined , and his excitements were somewhat of the coarsest . To gratify them , hfe teas at one time anxious to marry the fortune of Miss Tilney L . bng , who , howes er , preferred to endow the spendthrift Wellesley
Pole . He afterwards married a German princess , in the hope of iti < h ^ ashlg his rental by a Parliamentary grant of £ 6 , 000 per antiurrt . During the reign of the fourth George , he was made I ^ d High Admiral , and in that capacity he gratified his tastes for n 6 ise and show at a considerable expense of gunpowder . Tfeia did ttot suit the Tory Minister , who wanted the money for other
purposes . The Lord High Admiral , according to Court scandal , owed th ^ m a grudge for this , and threatened to * go it' with them ac thfc fltfst cpfiortutiity , whfctft his power might eqtial his will . When William the Fourth ascended the throne his feelings
Untitled Article
& 60 tJti& ' itirhiottn .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), April 2, 1835, page 260, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2644/page/36/
-