On this page
- Departments (2)
-
Text (9)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
THE KOPvTHESN STAR SATURDAY, MARCH 26, 1842.
-
Untitled Article
-
©0 %&eaur& anur CotTe^wntrentjaf*
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
MR . P . O'HIGGINS AND HIS TRADUCERS . TO THE EDITOR OP THE PRBKMATi ' S 30 TTBS&U Sia , —The Irish Universal Suffrage Association , seeing that it wa 3 grossly slandered , and its objects and proceedings wilfully misrepresented , in a report of the proceedings of the Loyal National Sepeal Association of Ireland , which were published in the Freer-tan's Journal of the l 3 t instant , passed a resolution , repudiating and disavowing the charges wh : ch tt ere made against it , and pronouncing the paity x rko mads those charges to be calumniators . This resolution wss sent to your paper for publication , a jad the cost of inserting it , as aa advertisement in the Dsi ^ Freeman of t ' ae 9 th , and Weekly Fre man , of the 12 th inst paid for . You , Sir , thong !" it , the terms of the resolution too "strong for public ition , and returned the money sooner than publish a ., document which , you said , contained a general JjIbel upon the whole of the members of the
Loyal r » national Repeal Association of Ireland . Now , Sir , I jb far from claming yon for refusing to pnblis ' rt acy speech , or paper of any Mud whatever , wbicJi migtet nave a tendency to subject your journal to a prosecution for libel ; but , permit me to ask you , is it just—i 3 it doing unto others as you would be dorA by , to allow a public body to libel ad libitum , through the columns of yosr paper , and to deny that individual or fas triends ihe common right of a reply through the same medium , but more especially when that reply was paid for as an advertisement ? In the Freeman of tee 1 st instant , amongst other matters grossly libellous , I find the following , reported as part of a speech of } klr . Thomas Steele , in allusion to some vague , wild , and incoherent observations which were made upon the occasion by the Rev . Mr . M'Hugb , whom 1 shall leave in ihe ' hands of his Grace the Carbolic Archbishop of Dublin . Mr . Sieele
said" Oh I what a terrific proof does my Reverend Friend ' s commuaieition exhibi : of the atrocious and baleful spirit of the Chartists ia this country , under ti-s instigation of O'HugVu 3 ar . d bis gang—( . hear , hear , and groans ) . By lar the greatest number of you who honour me wuh your attention are Caihohes ; andfrora the hour of the penal code in its deepest horror , did you hear of anything more accursed than , the' threat of the TuSiin _ Feargns O'Connor and Paddy O Hiegins' Cnariisis , to tear
down from his altar a Catholic clergyman , because he was warning the fl-.-ck confided to his care by his bishop , and his pontiff , and his Gcd , against tuoh diabolical villains as those who secretly instigated to the incendiary fires at Birmingham , to the scenes at Newport , aboard the convict-ship , and in the land of exiles . Who h this O'Higgirs ! Was he not expelled from the Volunteers , and his money returned to him , after a patient investigation by the whole committee , for a deliberate calumny oa the character ef a brother member V
Now , sir , I appeal to ywi and to my countrymen , if this is not ihe most dexterous use of words to impress upon the public mind ;—1 . That I am the head of a gang whom I instigated to drag a Cathonc clergyman from the altar ? 2 . That I seeretly instated to the incendiary fires at BirmiDghamJ the scenes at Newport , aboard tho eonvies-ship , and in the land " of cxilee ? 3 . That I was expelled from the society of Irish Tolunteers by the unanimous voice of the commitite , and my money returned to me i
It i 3 painful to me , and would be painful to any man of feeling , to be continually dragged before the public to refute calumnie 3 which have been refuted over and over again . To the first—my reply is , that I know nothing about the matter ; that I never heard of such a circumstance until I read the Freeman of the 1 st inst . ; that I believe the whole tale to be a fabrication , got op by short-sighted sinking men to suit the occasion ; that the charge 13 false in every part ; that instead of dragging , or instigating to drag , priests from the altar , I haTe done more to put priett 3 on- the altar than all the Steeles or Tom Steeles ia Ireland ; and that I yield to no man living in respect and veneration for the Roman Catholic clergy .
To the second charge—of secretly instigating to the fires at Birmingham , the scenes at Newport , & . c , —I was here in the City of Dublin quietly attending to my business , and laying ont more money among my feliow-citizens than I ever knew any iya . Ti of the name of Steele to be worth ; and the effort to mis up my name with these scenes , by certain forms of expression , is net quite £ 0 reasonable as it would be to ask , as the altitude of the Hiil of Howta is 740 feet above the level of the sea , what is the exact difference between Tom SteeTe's organ of veneration and ihe apex of the head of Djcer ' s great Spanis-h jsckass ! - With Tespei t to the third charge , which is that of having been expelled from the Volunteers by ihe unanimous vote of the committee , for a Cilumny on a brother member , and my money returned to me : this one semence contains two wilful falsehoods .
The & > t is , that the committee -was unanimous : thai is tossy , thai tbe whole of the members of that committee concurred in the sentence which was pronounced upon me ; this is the meaning which the charge , as stated , labours to impress upon the public . The second falsehood ia that my money was returned to me . This is not true . I never got back the money . Bat as Tom Stesle see&is to know something about it , I shall receive it thankfully if hi discharges his trust , and gives it to me even now .
As to the unanimity of the committee upon the vote of censure passed npon me , no one knows better than Tom Steele that ^ thit statement is utterly false . The majority of ths committee were in my favour , and the three-fourths of them for suppressing ihe matter altogether , lest , the charges which I b ? OHghi against Mr . Steele ' s friend j and whifh cannot be refuted , should bjure him in the way of his business . I knew that the charges would injure if made pabiic , and therefore I did not bring t aem bMoTe the public body , but before the commhtse— a committee which assumed the righ ; and the power to decide upon tie character of any man against
whom there was an objection by any other member . I was on the cemmitt ^ e myself , but refused . to continue a member of it when I saw a person put on it to whom I , at any rate , had a valid objection . My first proposition to the committee waF , th at if they would appoint twelve men against whom there could be no reasonable objection , I should then £ ta-te my reasons for withdrawing myself from the committee . This fair and reasonable proposition was objected to ; asd I was called upon by the resolution of the coiEiEinee—on thamotion of ilr James Nugent , of Kingstown , to state the- charges in writ ing . io name the parry objected to , eei ! tb ^ t the whole committee sLonld take the matter" Into
con-Ficeratioa . To this proposal I ultimately assented . There were fifty-ose members on the committee , twenty-three of whom—and twenty-three only—had the baseness to declare , to sign a paper pronouncing the charges fake' and calumnious , while twentyeight held just a contrary opinion , and left the room nuder the impression tnat the subject would end there . Who are those that signed thatlyisg document 1—what is their occupation?—how many of them have made their escape from the country ? The majority of the twenty-three mean-spirited sycophants and toad-eaters who . signed the censure npou me were , fur the most part , subsisting upon
thefund 3 which they exacted from myself and otaer dupes like me , under the pretence of repealing tbe Union . It was expedient to get rid of me—first , because I knew and told Mr . O'Connell , in the presence of osber members of tbe committee , the real state of the case between Mr . T . Steele and 0 Gorman Mahon . I knew too many of the facts of the plunder of the monasteries t . nd convents in the neigbboarhord of Cadiz . Ieta ' ed rhe facts connected with the discreditable transactions by Wigly , Dixon , and Co . ; and I mentioned that O'Gorman Mahon , Id whom 1 had never spoken till years afterwards was the dura and victim cf this nest . In addition
to these crimes , I had the hardihood to object to the Bia-i-appropiiation of the large fuud whicn was subscribed for tithe ssfferers . Tht-sc were crimes which conid not be overlooked , and the occasion was anxiously , though £ ecre > Jy , sought for destroying jne , fearing the facts of which 1 was cognizant , and wkieh my mercantile habits tnd connections afLrced the Biean 3 of ascertaining should be made public . Can . any man for a moment imagine that the charges ¦ whveh depended for their truth or falsehood upon the written and oral testimony of other ? , conid be pronounced to be false and calumnious , without any examination of that oral testimony , cr examination of the written testimony I
The written testimony bears the signatures—Sobers Cully , accountant-general of the -Bank of Ireland } of Miehael Roach . secretary to the Hibernian Bank ; of Obadiah Willans and Sons , Lower Bridge-street ; of Robert Bjrne and Co ., Lower Bridge-street ; of Armstrong and Byrne . MeJchants ' - << aay ; of Blood , Nott , and Co ., Trinity-street ; of Wa Locke , of the linen Hall j of Greenough and Robinson , Manchester ; of Longworth and Co ., Siaaehester ; of William BoltonAnd Co ., Manchester ; and until such time a 3 it is shewn that the documents bearing the foregoing signatures are all forgeries , the sestence pronounced npon me , and signed by twenty-three out of a Commistee of fiftyone , gives to their ovtb act the stigma which they sought to fix upon mine .
Now , Sir , it must be admitted that I have been most wantonly provoked into this statement . I had no wish for it ; but if my accusers desire it , and that youwifl besoMnd as to afford me space for the whole case , I shall Btata the whole , as I have the original documents in my possession , and I promise you that you shall h&Sk ? no t&ore atxmt my expulsion . Tiereis not ah unprincipled adventurer , a coward , or a profligate , who enters on a political speculation , but avails himself of tbi 3 expulsion as a screen for nis cowardly attacks upon n » 9 .
It has been asked , through your paper , who is ilr . O'Higgins ? This is a modest question ti be asked about a man who has paid rent , and taxes in the city of Dublin for nearly twenty years . It is fair to ask . who . sie those who put this wisb que 3-tiov , and who are those who concurred-in it ? The
Untitled Article
c ' tizens of Dublin should know that they are a set 0 / political adventurers , some of whom have neither house nor home , and who have no other visible means of living than that of subsisting upon the weekly sums obtained from their oonfidmg and credulous dupes , under the pretence of Repealing the Union , while they know right well that their great leader has honestly declared that he will not bring that question forward in the House of Commons until he has a petition , signed by 4 , 000 , 000 of Irishmen , while at the same time it is well known that there are not 3 . 500 , 009 male inhabitants in Ireland , including new-born babes .
In conclusion , Sir , permit me to say , on the part of the members of the Irish Universal Suffrage Association , and on my own part , that we deem it incumbent on us , collectively and individually , thus publicly to proclaim , that our respect for , and veneration and admiration of , the exemplary and exalted character of the Irish Catholic Clergy , is as un bounded as * that of asy oiher society of men in the universe ; that we have neither secrets nor oaths of any nature or kind in our association i that we
consider none as friends but those who will tell to every body everyihiug they hear and see at the meetings of theassociation ; that the Irish Universal Suffrage Associationhasbeenfoundedfor the purposeofobtaining by legal and constitutional means , and by such means only , Universal Suffrage , Vote by Ballot , Annual Parliaments , Equal Electoral Districts , No Property Qualification , and Payment of Members ; and , when these blessings are obtained , a Repeal of the Union . Patbick O'Higgins .
President of the Irish Universal Suffrage Association ; the man who got up the first meeting for the O'Connell Tribute , and the second who subscribed £ 10 to it . This is for the information of those who have asked the question , " Who is Mr . O'Riggius V
Untitled Article
THE PEEL BUDGET . Ate ! and a Budget it is too ! Whatever it may have cost Sir Robert Peel in its concoction , it has had a marked and powerful effect upon the country at large since its development . The Minister seems to have taken all parties by surprise at the nature and extent of his measures , whether in the imposition of new- taxes or the remission of the old ones he gives up . No one seems to have been prepared for so decided a course on the part of Sir Robert Peel . The consideration of bis new plans has , with tbe trading and monied classes ,
superseded all other questions . In fact , amongst these parties nothing is talked of at present but the Peel Budget . Go where you may ; mix with what company you may , and the first question you invariably hear is , " What think you of the New Budget !" This question naturally receives different and conflicting answers , according to the notions of each one replying to it . There is one thing , however , upon which all are agreed . All , whether opposed to the Minister or not , agree in representing the Budget as the boldest step taken by any Minister for a long period of time .
Peel boldly proclaims that there can be no reduction of expenditure ! He tells the interested of both parties , that if " National Faith " is to be kept ; if payment of the interest upon our accumulating Debt is to be continued ; if our thundering and . unconstitutional Army is to be kept up , to squeeze the taxes out of the bones of the labourer ; if our big and boastful Navy is to be maintained , with her hosts of admirals , rear * admira l s , and shoals of inferior officers and " dead weight , " if the " Queen ' s Civil List "
is to be kept at its present enormous amount ; if Prince Albebt ' s pin-money is to be continned ; if the Pensions , and Sinecures , and Granls , are to continue to be ; if the doubly-augmented Salaries of the Judges and other officers of the State are to be paid : Peel , boldly and honestly proclaims to the Members of " that House , " that if they wish these things to exist , they mxisi Jtnd him the means of ' payment ; and lie
also explicitly tells them that they can sq « f eza no more ont of the poor man ; that the taxing-string around the labourer's neck is as tight as it can safely be drawn ; that another twitch would strangle the pinioned wretch ; and that to provide the necessary means , the owners of property and ihe possessors of income must submit to a direct tax which shall make up the deficiencies arising from the working people being unable to pay !
Verily , Peel is a bold man ! Ho is bold in proclaiming at this juncture , and amid the horrible destitution everywhere prevailing , that there can be no reduction of expenditure ! that the State leeches cannot be induced to slacken their hold J and that he , for one , is unwilling to attempt to make them . He is bold in daring to propose to re-establish upon the monied classes one of the most unpopular , and ( with them ) one of the most odious tixes that can exist ; and he is bolder still in attempting to establish the means to collect from the middle classes the tax so imposed !
If he succeed in getting it from them , he will be a bold man indeed ¦ ] An Income Tax is widely and essentially different from a Property Tax . The latter would merely call upon those who possess property , tangible property , to pay according to the rate laid down ; the former imposes a tax upon incomes , no matter from what source they may be derived ! The physician , who has no property , but whose income is the result of Ms skill : the author , whose income is derived from
the exercise of his talents ; the builder or the blacksmith , whose incomes result from the exorcise of their respective crafts ; all these , and others similarly situate , are , by an Income Tax , taxed just as much as the man who derives an immense income from property , without any , ihe slightest , exercise of talent , or skill , or even industry . ' This is an injustice of so monstrous a kind a 3 only to be paralleled by the acts of the monied classes themselves towards the labouring people .
To this consideration must be added the necessarily Inquisitorial nature of the machinery to ascertain the amount of each man ' s income . The prying , the questioning , and the examining into a shopkeeper ' s bnsiness , or into a merchant's account ? , to ascertain whether he ought to pay the tax or not ; and , if he is taxable , to fix the amount ; all these must be particularly agreeable to those subject to such visitations and inquiries ' . I'faith , Peel is a bold man , to venture to propose to deal in this manner with the shopkeeping anj trading classes !!
What a squeak ! what a squeal ! there will be set up , when the plan comes into full operation What a noise , and din , and clamour the "loyal " tax-payers will kick up , when the tax-gatherer waits upou them , with Peel's compliments , for £ 2 ISi . ii . for every on © of their "hundred pounds ;" and an unequivocal intimation that he must have these £ 2 18 s . -ii . ' s directly to pay the dividends with , or " National Faiih" will be broken ! O what denunciation we shall hear 2 What abuse J It will be well for the tax-gatherer if hard words are all he gets besides the money !
Of the horrible bellowing that will be set up by the " loyal" " national faith" men , when the tax comes to be fetched from them , some faint conception may be had from a perusal of the shopkeepers' and traders * press , and from the proeeedings in " that House" on the part of the opposition . " For some days , the Whig remnant seemed stunned by Peel ' s announcements . Tbe nature and magnitude of his projects , and the clearness and candour of his address in developing them , completely " knocked the wind" oat of the Whigs .
When they contrasted his sweeping measure of " Commercial Reform , " embracing as it does 1 , 200 articles of import , and repealing tks duties npon by far the greater half of the number , and greatly reducing the duties upon the other half ; when they contrasted this measure with their own machlauded and highly-vaunted " great" scheme , which merely included three articles o £ import , and openly professed to deal with them in a manner that would raise from them , in taxes , more money than is now paid upon them ;
Untitled Article
when they contrasted Pebl ' s measure with their own , aad remembered that one portion of their own was the institution of a fixed purr on corn , for the purpose of raising ADDITIONAL REVENUE to supply the existing deficiency j when tht y thus contrasted the two sohemes , they instinctively saw that Peel had out-bid them I and that hia object was to purchase the support of the trading classes ! They also Eaw that he had calculated well ; that his tariff scheme was cunningly devised ; that it was very catching , and very likely to answer the intended purpose : and 60 they determined , if possible , to spoil the spott by denouncing the other portion of Peel ' s plan , the new taxes , and , by appeals to the cupidity of the monied classes , array their power
against Peel on the ground of opposition to the Income Tax . The cue having been given , little Lord John became suddenly valiant . He announced in " that House , " " that he would move counter resolutions to those proposed by Peel ; that he would oppose the Income Tax Bill in all its stages , dividing "the House" upon the first , second , and third readings , and also on the bringing up of the Report . Other Members in his train also shewed " big fight ; " and while this game was played off inside "the wallB of Parliament , ^ the free traders ' press was performing its patt outsido by inserting heaps of letters from pretended correspondents , denouncing the Income Tax in all sorts of ways , and for all sorts of reasons .
All this is but preparatory to the calling of public meettkgs , at whioh the Whigs and Whiglings of every water and degree will ttrenuously endeavour to get the public voice expressed against Peel and his DIRECT system of taxation . It is for the purpose of preparing and counselling the people how to meet this next" new move" that we address them on the subject at present In the first place , then , we aver , that the principle of DIRECT TAXATION involved in Peel's Income-tax , demands for his plan the strenuous support of every man who livesby the labour of his hands .
He is greatly and immediately interested in getting the principle of direct taxation acknowledged and universally acted upon . If it were so ; if it was in full operation ; if in-direct taxation was superseded , nothing like the amount of taxes now wrung from his labour by a silent and unseen process could possibly be raised ! If the taxgalherer had to call at every man ' house , and demand the sum now yearly paid in another way , he would get by far " more kicks than ha ' pence ! " Every one would then know the amount he had to pay . He now knows nothingofit ; nor can hepossibly be made to know it
as lie would do were the money fetched from him disectlt . He now goes to market ; buys his sugar , his tea , or his tobacco : he pays for each article what he conceives is the price of it . He does not know that , when he pay 3 3 d . for an ounce of tobacco , 2 d . of the amount is for tax . He finds the tobacconist charges him 3 d . ; and he knows all others in the same line of business do the same ; and he , therefore , pays the 3 d . unbegrudingly . But suppose he only paid the tobacconist the real price of the article ; suppose the price of it to be only Id . ; and that as he leaves the shop he is accosted by th »
taxgatherer , who demands from him another 2 d . to pay the fundholder with ; suppose this , and we may very easily further suppose that the taxgatherer would much oftener measure his length in the kennel than get the 2 d . ! 2 And so on of all other articles . It would be impossible for any Government to collect from a people so large a sum in taxes by direct , means as they can by indirect means . It is clearly and manifestly , therefore , the interest of all tax-payers , that a system of direct taxation should exist . And as the labouring people are the tax-payers ; as it is by the things produced that taxes can alone be paid : as
it is clearly impossible for those who produce not ta have anything of their oxen wherewith to satisfy tbe demands of the government ; as the burden of taxation , whether large or small , must eventually fall upon the shoulders of the labouring portion of the community ; it is still more apparent , it is still more clearly manifest that it is their duty and interest to insist upon the universal application of the principle of DIRECT taxation . On this ground , then , the proposal of Peel to tax Incomes in a plain straight-forward and direct manner , is entitled to their hearty and undivided support .
There is another principle , too , involved in this Income-tax project , which also entitles the measure to tbe support of the labouring many . Property is Taxed . The man who has been able , by the operation of the blessed system under which we live , to accumulate to himself a large heap of the good things of life , is tared according to the scale laid down . What can be more equitable ? What can be more just ] What objections are there that can be urged against this principle ? True , that what he has , has come from labour ; true , that the labour yearly expended upon his
estate , or upon the raw material in his mill , alone gives value to them , and is the source whence his income is derived ; true , that if he pays a portion of that income in direct taxes to the Government , he has less to spend in the market upon the productions of other labour ; true all this ; yet he now gets the income ; the labouring people have thai to provide for him , as well as their immediate share of the indirect taxes ( now paid ; and it will not , in all cases , happen that if a tax is laid upon incomes , tbe " property men" will be ablo to make these who labour produce more for them to pay the tax with ; though , in-too many cases , we
grieve to say , they will havo this power . They cannot , however , have it , in all cases ; , and whenever this happens to be , the tax is a subtraction from the rich man's income to the clear and manifest benefit of the labouring people , who now have both income and taxes to raise . They , therefore , are deeply and immediately interested in having all the taxes necessary imposed upon PROPERTY , and collected in a DIRECT and immediate manner . Both these principles are involved in Peel's Income tax : and these are reasons why the plan of taxation he has proposed , as far as tb . 9 institution of that particular tax is concerned , should be supported by the labourers of England .
Aye , but it may be said , have you not already admitted that the proposed Income tax is a " monstrous injustice" 1 We have ! But in what doe 3 the injustice consist ? In submitting incomes to the action of taxation 1 Not a bit of it ! Incomes of every description ought to be taxed . Everyman ought to bear his share of the burdens of the state according to his visible means . The injustice we have pointed out consists , not in the taxing of incomes derived from profes sious or trades , but in taxing these incomes to the same amount , and in the same degree , as incomes derived frem certain
and fixed properties . The first class are the result of labour and skill ; and though they certainly ought not to be free from taxation , yet it is clear they ought not to pay in the same proportion as incomes derived without exertion or skill . The uncertain nature of the incomes derived from trade and professions , is another reason why they should not be taxed so highly as the incomes derived from a more certain source ; but it is no reason why they should be exempted from taxation . The case of these parties , then , in relation to the working man , is just this : if they think Peel has not taxed the possessors
of incomes arising from landed and funded property , or from buildings , high enough in proportion to the amount he has proposed to lay upon incomes ar ising from the exercise of trade , or . tts following of professions , let them bothtr Pma . TO MAKE IT HIGHER , and remit some other tax which presses immediately upon the labouring people ; but don't let them try to persuade the labouring people to get tradesmen and professional men exempted from the tax . No , no . If they like , we will try to increase the measure of taxation upon those who certainly ought , in all justice , to pay more ; but we as certainly will not advise that the labouring people
Untitled Article
should aid or countenance , or oven permit , any attempt on the part of the traders , either to relieve themselves from , the operation of Peel ' s measure , or to reduce the amount he proposes to raise from them . Three pet ; cent , is a very low figure . The traders think so in their transactions one with another , and ^ in theit ' dealings with the people . They may try , if they like , - to induce Peel to lay six per cent , upon the owners of tangible and certain propetty , while he retains the present amount upon incomes from other sources ; but they must not be permitted to hitohfoff the burden from themselves , or tp lessen the proposed amount .
It is but £ 4 , 00 e , 000 , at the very outside , that Peel proposf a to raise by means of this Income tax ! Only £ 4 , 000 , 000 !! By other and indirect ineaHS he raises £ 63 , 000 , 000 ! I ! The Wain portion of this £ 53 , 000 , 000 is wrung from toe lajjourers of JIngland . The time has come when the Government cannot ; possibly raise mow from this olasa . Pbel distinctly saysso . He ^ says , moreover , that : if he is to satisfy tbe demands made upon him , he must have the
money . He further says , that those who are able must make up the deficiency . Those to whom Peel thus appeals say that they will not respond to his call ! They denounce the measure as one of rohbery and plunder . They have no objection to the laboaring poor paying the ^ 53 , 000 , 000 ; but they have a great objection to pay only £ 4 , 000 , 000 amongst themselves 1 !! O ! the tender conscience of a free-traderj- —when his pocket is touched ! I
" Yes ; but / ' rejoins the objector , '' what need is there for Peel to raise the £ 4 , 000 , 0001 Why does he not reduce the expenditure ? " Aye , why ! you besotted bruto I Why 1 Because you , will not ^ et him I Dp you not insist upon " National Faith" being kept ? Do you not insist upon the interest of the Debt being paid in full ? Do yoa not stand up for the Pension List , the Civil List , the Salaries , and the Grants I Have you not spurned and spit upon the labouring people , when they asked you , years ago , to aid them to get the expenditure reduced 1 Did yap not join in ^ "loyal '' and patriotic associations to put down
the Radicals , who only wanted to do then what you now require'i Did you hot mount a horse , string a sword by your side , put a pistol in your pocket , and dub yourself a " Yeomanry Cavalry man , " and turn out to butoher in cold blood those who wanted to obtain from the Government justice for you as woll as for themselves ? Did you not joinin the passing of addresses to the Government , thanking theih for suspending thb Habeas Cofpui ( Act , and for imprisoning for years together , hundreds of as good men as England ever saw , and then turning them out of jail without even telling the captives tohy they had been placed in confinement ! !!
Did you not applaud the unfeeling monsters who jested in . " .. that "House " - upon the Bufferings and excruciating torments endured by the victims of your hellish schemes to put down the rising spirit of liberty ? And have you not latteily countenanced the Government in their wholesale imprisonmout of the Chartistal Were you not one of those who eat in the jury-box , and convicted them of seeking to do that which you now , yourself , ask to be done ? You are a pretty beast to ask for a reduptionef expenditure ! You are a pretty beast to object to pay taxes !! Base reptile ! Immeasurably base ! Tax him , Peel ! ! Lay it on ! Let him pay ?——and be hanged !
No , no ; it will not dp for those who support , and have supported , the present infernal system of Debt and Robbery , to object to the proposed Income tax . Such an objection , or rather a demand for a reduction of expenditure may come , as it has ever come , from the labouring people , and come with a good grace ; but if those who have , hounded on the myrmidons of power upon the poor , for denouncing the robberies coinmitted upon their labour ; if those who acted in "Volunteer abmed Associations ;• ' if
those who enlisted in the ?' Yeomanry Corps : ^ ' if those who aided and abetted in the prosecutions of the Radicals and Chartists , because they complained of the weight of taxation 1 ; if those who did all or any of these things should now venture to complain—now , that the workings of their praisebespattered system has made it necessary that their incomes should be taxed ; if any one of these should dare to urge one word of public complaint , let infamy and ineffable scorn be his portion !!!
There can be no reduction of expenditure while the present system obtains I To reduce the expenditure means to reduce the Debt ; to disband the Army ; to repeal the Pension List ; to reduce the Salaries ; to remove the Dead Weight ; to lessen the Civil List ; and to dock Prince Albebt's allowance . Will the Free Traders go for this ?! Dare they tackle the fundhblderi Are they prepared to grapple with the real ; question ! If they are , let them blame Peel for seeking to keep up the expenditure , and for devising schemes to get the
money to pay with : but if they are net , blistered be the tongue of every mother's eon of them who dares to utter even half a word in the way of complaint at having to pay the quota , imposed upon him ! Peel ia right . If the monied classes will have " the sys tern , " they must find him the means of payment . The old saying that " you cannot both eat your loaf and have your loaf " is strictly applicable here . The devourer of taxes cannot swallow the money , and have the money ! More grist must come to the mill , or tho mill must stand : and those who are in love
with our present grinding system , must find the means to keep it up !! O 1 what a glorious Bight it is to see the " loyal " in such a stew about paying taxes i During the heyday Of their " loyalty , " when * loans" and "banknotes" were as plentiful as blackberries ; when " we " were " at war" with both France and America ; when ! " Bank Restriction" exist id ; when : our ¦ " resources" were in process of "development . ;" in those good old times , if a man dared to say a word against the wars then being carried on , or against the taxes
imposed upon the labouring people to pay for the wars and the interest upon the " loans ; " if a man in those days dared to utter a word against the Heaven-born Minister and his system of Debt and Taxation , hia taeth were down his throat in an instant I Then it was that the f' loyal" " pledged their lives and their fortunes" TThea it was that they urged the Minister to spend hand-brer-head , never thinking of "to-morrow . '' Now they have to taste some little of their own system . Now it has partly reached them ! The taste they have got is as nothing , compared with what is
to come 1 but the little they have had makes them wince most confoundedly 1 Look at the sight just now L Peel merely proposes to raise from them £ 4 , 000 , 000 ; and they stand aghast 1 Hark to the yell of execration with which his proposal is met 1 and then reflect that the winoers are those who have resisted all attempts to adjust the Taxation and the Debt equitably between the payers and the receivers ; the borrowera and the lenders r Ah ! let them wiuce ! Let them ynriggle and writhe !! but don't let them cast-off the burden from themselves until they are willing and anxious to relieve the poor
man as well ! Whenever they , are prepared to do this ; whenever they are prepared to act with justice to all parties ; whenever they ^ are prepared to go for Equitable Adjustment , and a reduction of taxation ; whenever they are prepared to do these things , and to get the Charteb for their accomplishment , labouring people then you heariteii to jwhat they say , and entertain their proposals ; but , until then ; until they be so prepared ; until they are prepared to act in good
faith towards YOU , let them whistle to the winds , and dance jigs to the mile-stones ! Above all things , mind that they do not hitch-off the Inoomo Tax !! 1 You have ^ had ther harness and the collar to wear long enough ; it * ias robbed into the rat * deep enough , and no commiseration could you find ,. . They have had a spanking bran new set , of "improved" and "light" make , made for them by Peel : let them wear it // Insolent and overbearing as they have been towards you when you complained of ; the . wrong done xp « y ' they will
Untitled Article
not shew . a muoh better sample of patience !; Let us look at them , however . Let oa fairly " see bow they Ike it \ . f * - ' andlet pis take care tiiat they dotft kick off the yoke until they are prepared to take off-ours ; olaol : -. ' *¦ * * ' -. . '¦ . - ¦ ¦ - _ ¦ ¦ ¦ * - . ; ¦ ¦*¦ ' * * / : Yv " ; ;¦ - :
Untitled Article
THE STAR AND THE EXECUTIVE . Elsewhere we Rive an article from the Executive , which seems to require from us a word of explanation . The Executive say-- ; \ . ^ : Wemu 8 t , inthe most friendly , but determined manner , protest against the Editor associating the Executive Council with the humbug trap and the Bath conferencq . We have tho greatest possible respect for Air . Hill , Mr . O'Connor , and Mr . O'Brien ; but we must Bay that the former is not justiricd in making the ExeoQtive answerable for aught save their own acts as a body , or in mixing them up . as a Counoil , with the private prooeedinga of Mr . Vincent , Mr . Philp / praDy other man . "
Had our good mends of the Executive read the article to which , the above sentences allude , with their accustomed carefulness , they would have saved themselves the trouble of writing , and us of replying to them ; for they would iiave seen that we have done no such thing as mix up their acts as a public body with those of Mr . Vikcent or any other private individual ; nor have we made them as a body at all responsible for the individual acts of Mr . Philp , wha is one of theirbody . We have confined ourselves simply and solely to that which they with the greatest fairness admit to have been our duty , the expressing of our own opinion of their public acts and recommendations .
The whole misapprehension arises from the fact , that in our paper of the 12 ih ; inEt ,, for the mere saying of room and time , we classed three distinct subjects of comment together in one article , heading it thus : — " the Humbug Trap ^ -The Bath Conference —The policy of the Executive . " And a reference to the article will show that in oui observations upon these subjects wo kept them perfectly distinct the one from the other . We think if our friends of the Executive will read the article again , they will see this ; and willsee , therefore , that the injustice » f which they complain exists only in their own misapprehension .
To their observations in dissent from our opinion of the resolution in question , we have no reply to make j our opinion was honestly expressed ; we hare nodoubttheirsigsotoo . Ths people will decide ; and we think the ¦ Executive perfectly right to take their instructions from ao other quarter . We again give our deliberate opinion , that the only safe course for the people is to "chuck overboard" EVEBTTHiNO but the Charter ,
Untitled Article
"Now , surely , Mr . Philp must BaTeforgotteh , in the goodness of bis heart , the experience of all the last five years . ; Who have been the moat forward ia the jury boxes , and on the benon , t » coavict ind sentence Charti&ts !; Have they not been the very parties who have , over and / byer . again , in the Reform Bill agitation , testified to , and contended for , the very same principle— -the principle that representation should be co-extensive with'taxation 1 " This is the whole amount of our " dictation "—of our " malicious abuse and misrepresentation . " - ^
If the most fastidious of Mr . Philp's friends can find therein a angle word disrespectful to Mr . Philp , we will quite willingly sit down to be troddei *^^ upon as the mushroom in Mr . Philp ' s path ; if they ' cannot , they will perhaps bo ablo to | lnd out who has moat reason ( if it were wottH while ) to complain of " misrepresentatipn and falsehood . " Ia any case we shall not aliow either " iaushxcoms , ' or angry men , like Mr . Philp , to turn U 3 from our path . We shall neither sufPor the people ' s cause to be damaged by treachery nor imprudence without giving warning , nor will we be driven into an abusive ' personal conflict because Mr . Piiap desires it . We have given our opinion on the policy
of Mr . Philp and his friendB . We have done so respectfully but honestly . We ; have given ; the people the reasons u , pon which that opinion is founded . We have discharged our duty ; and it is now for the people to determine on the merits of the matter . It is for them to say whether they approve , as wise and safe , the policy of Mir . Philp and his friends and abettors ; and we have too great an opinion of their good sense , to believe that the insolent and bullying tone assumed by Ilr . P hilp , will be allowed to influence their judgment . They will judge of the policy on its own merits , and not on those of Mr . Philp , as one of the very few individuals calling themselves Chartists who
advocate . it . ; . .- ' " . '¦"¦ " -.. " . - ' ' "¦ . : ;¦ ' ; - ' -::. \ : : ¦¦;' .: . ¦ . ¦¦ ' ' :- ' : ¦ < Mr . PHrtP ' . " . claims independence of thought and of action , " while he is outrageously angry with other people for asserting a like claim by censuring him , or eVeh dissenting from his opinion ! Pretty consistent in an advocate of demboratio principles 1 Mr . Philp says not a word about his intention to comply , or otherwise , with the call made upon him by almost the whole Chartist body to resign his
seat in the Executive , Perhaps it may comport with his nqtiona . of democratia principle to rank Wa constituents among tho " mushroome . " However , it is near the time that a new Executive must be elected , and Mr . P . will then have an opportunity of learning how far his coquetting with the Sturgites as a matter Of policy , and his mode of defending an alleged error of judgmerit , as a matter of principle and character , is approved of by the people .
Untitled Article
SPLENDID AND COSTLY PRESENT TO THE READERS OF THE" NORTHERN ; ;; ,. STAR . " v ' :.. '/ -v " -J- ' - -: ^ Y ] ' \ : \ :: , Detehmined to commemorate every great national event connected with th « present " movement , ' Mr . O'Connor has entered into arrangements for presenting the Subscribdrs to the Star with a large and splendid Engraving of the Presen'¦ tationof ¦'¦¦ ¦ ¦• ¦ ¦ :- -: ' " ' : - ¦ "¦ ' ¦ ¦ v '" y ¦ ' ¦¦ ¦ ¦ . "¦ - ¦ ¦ '" " -
THE GREAT NATIONAL PETITION to the House of Commons . / This Plate will be as much superior to the Engravings already given with the Star , as they were to any ever given with any other newspaper . 11 will be divided , as it were , into three main compartments . The first will representthe Delk-GATESinCONVENTIONASSEMBLED . preVlOUStostarting with the Petition to the House of Commons . The centre and largest compartment will represent the Procession » co 6 mpanying the Petition to the House , the Petition itself , the Beabers of it , and the People , when passing Whitehall , and approaching Palace Yard . The third
comejrtment will representthe Petition IN THE OUSE ; when *? laid on the tableY' being a general view of the Interior of the House of : CommonB , theBar and the Speaker's Chair being prominent features .-In addition to these ma ? u compartments the upper and lower edges of the plate will be divided into sixteen other smaller compartments , each one of which will contain an acourata representation of some great Publio Building passed ia the route from the Convention Rooms to the Parliament House . Views willthus be given of Temple Bar , St . Clement Dane ' s , - Church , Somerset House , Exeter Hall . St . Mary-le-:
Strand , Trafalgar Square , Northumberland House , Whitehall . Richmond Terrace , The Admiralty , The Horse Guards , Westminster Bridge , The Treasury , Westminster Abbey , and St . Margaret's Church , Westminster Halliand the Exterior of the House of Common . There will thus be given ; upon one very large sheet , Ninetbe * Splendid Pictures , all harmoniously combined to make the whole an effective and worthy representation of the most important movement ever made by the English people ia favour of liberty . The terms upon which the Plate will be issued are asfollow : —• :
Every Subscriber to the Star for Four Months from the 9 th of April will be entitledto ; a Plate . We do not promise to have it ready at that time , though in all probability it will be ; yet we do not promise ; for the work will be '{' . one of such a character j and will need such careful attention on the part of the Engraver , aa to defy any one to fix an exact time . This , however , we do promise . If the plate is not then ready , every subscriber is at liberty to cease his subscription , holding his ticket , and receiving his plate and paper from the Agent he has subscribed with , the day it is presente < Jf just as if he had continued to Bubsoribe . The Price of the Paper the week the Plate is prasentrsd will be One Shilling . We will try to make such arrangements as will make this the only oharge the Subeoribera will have ; to
' . Pay * ' ¦ . : - . - ¦• : .. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ . - . : ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ -. ¦ ¦ ¦' . " ¦ ¦ ¦¦¦ v-Agents , therefore , will please t © open subscription lists , and in all oases furnish the eubscribei with a ticket , which ticket will entitle him to the Plate whenever it is given for subscribing for the Star for four months . As soon as possible , specimens shall be placed in the hands of the Agents .
Untitled Article
Mr . Philp and the GhabtistYbody . —Fc art inundated with letters of complaint about the non-insertion of the rtumeroua resolutions last week sent to us censuring Mr . Philp , and calling upon him forthwith to resign his office of Executive Councillor tor the National Charier Astoriation . Now it iJr useless folly thus to annoy us ' .. The insertion of all those resolutions in ftill must of necessity have driven out of the paper a very large amount of valuable matter , merelyJof a repetition of the same thing over and over again . The proper way of proceeding is this : at every place where such resolutions were passed , the sub Secretary should send a c 6 pytoMr < PhUpt \\ Chandos buildings , Bath , and another to the
General Secretary of the Executive , this ought to be done in justice to w , to Mr . Philp , to tht Executive , and'to the ' Chartist body'generally . Stars to Ireland . —There is much anxiety amongst the working men of Ireland to read the Star ; its proprietor knows how unable they are to procure it from their individual resources—small as is its price x it is that of a loaf + or a stone of potatoes . Those of our English brethren , then * who would wish to sow the good seed in a profitable soil cannot better serve the cause than by directing their Si&rs , after reading ; them , to W . H . JDyott , secretary to the Irish Universal Suffrage Association , at 14 , N . Anne-street , tcnO will take care to employ them weU .
James Sweet begs to acknowledge the receipt of tM following sums for the Convention , viz ., 7 s . Safrom Alfretoii , Derbyshire lOs . from Gainsbro 1 Lincolnshire ; and £ , 1 from Boston , Lincahf ¦ : ¦ " - . shire . . . ¦••¦ " . ; : " .:. ' ¦ ¦"¦' . - ¦ ' ¦ ¦¦; ' : ' /¦ ., ' .. - ¦ : - - ' . ¦ ¦ .:. . ¦ _ ¦ All Communications to Mr . G . M . Bartlett mutt « addressed to him at \ 9 , Gloucester-road'buildto § t > Lower Swanswick , Bath . Wm . FosTeR , BiNGLEY . ^—ifis rcp « r / of the deUgw meeting was noticed last week . " :. ¦ ¦'¦ .. ' Halifax < Jhahtists . —We have not room for M ^ tongkiterofremonslr ^ Tice to Mr . Vincent : Mi had better post it to him ; A Retibrd Blackikiij Manefactorer calls the »•
ientuMofthe Chartist publtc , strongly to & > $ PiriZer ' sTtldiekinffi ' says that he is Oititecertaut , from the knowledge he htus of the businett , «* ¦ profitsof' } Mr , Pindet cannoteiceeedU . ofW-lF gross fay ' dU : KttMtiurrti ^ $ ; itot ' ihe ' ni # W * v monthsfought from this ionrce to bring ahunare * pounds' to the Executive , and a thousandPV ^ intq local fujifc , from ihe profits of ptlrww ' ' retailers . ' ¦ ' ¦¦¦"'¦• . ' -. ' : ¦ " ¦ : ¦ ¦ - ' " ¦' : " ^ : ¦ -. ¦' - ' - ' ' . - ' . * ' ¦ - . ¦ The St 6 ckport Friends request that Hasle Fry ¦ Marple , and this surrounding districts , that nave ' - ¦ had petitions from Stockport will send t / uni tn oy theSOth MarehinstantiasaJliviUhavetosoj ^ . ¦¦¦¦ •• gethertoMdcchsfield otitJus Si-dApriLAnyi " Wertte 3 lsitf Ma ^
The Kopvthesn Star Saturday, March 26, 1842.
THE KOPvTHESN STAR SATURDAY , MARCH 26 , 1842 .
Untitled Article
MR . ROBERT KEMP PHILP . This gentleman seems in a sad taking ! We haye received , per favour of a friend , an early copy of this day's Vindicator the first article in which is from his pen , upon the subjebt of the Bath Confer ? ences , the reports sent us by our correspondent , and the observations we thought it our duty to make thereon . Of course Mr . Philp is the best judge of the couteo best calculated to effect any purpose he may ^ lave in view . We shall give so muoh of this article as refers to U 3 and to the Star , and leave the people to receive it for as much as they think it worth . After eulo-Iogising the Charter , and stating that there are *' amongst the Chartist body very many sincerely and honestly devoted to their country's cause , men who have sacrificed much , " &o . Mr , Philp . goes
on : — . . ¦ -: .. ¦ - . ¦ ¦ ¦ . / _ • ... ¦ ' * But there are some mixed up with Chartism , to its prejudice and injury , big in self esteem ; who , having imperfeotl y learned the alphabet of politics , presume to speak its language . Such mtn are but drags upon the wheel of human progression ; their adoration is of men , not of principles ; their discourses ABUSE AND DECLAMATION , not ARGUMENT . They seek to earn a reputation , and not having the ability to gain a People ' s esteem for themselves , they assail the characters of others , that $ hioy may be elerated by their doHmfall , * ¦¦¦? "The course I have taken I am still prepared to
defend , and will still pursue , notwithstandiog the falsehoods of Bartlett , to which several additions are made in tho Star of the lflth ; notwitstanding the dictatorship of its EditoTi and the suppression of most important parts ef the explanatory correspondence , together with the unfair application of brief extracts from my speech . I declare for INDEPENDENCE ! of thought and of action . If I can fail to adduce argument and reason for my position , if I compromise a single principle , TH ? N LET ME BE CONDEMNED . I COUrt not DOpUlarity , nor praise ; I labour zealously to advance the cause of Chartism , but I am : not to be turned from my path by every mushroom that starts up in my wa y . \\ ¦ ' . ;¦¦ ; . ¦ ¦ " ;/'"¦ . /¦ ' -. ; - ' v ' - ;' - ¦ ¦ . " '¦ ''¦ ' ; .. ' "'
. ** Chartism , indeed , has brought us to a very unenviable position , if those who are its zealous promoters dare not think for themselves , and cannot secure a true representation of their acts in the leading Chartist organ . Let those Crocch who will—I ' ll not be a slave . If any of ' my Chartist brethren desire from me'my own explanation of what J did in respect of Sturge ' s declarationi I will most readily and willingly comply ; but I protest against being judged by the lying , prejudiced , and ignorant reports , of a man with whom I shall ever hereafter deem it dishonourable to hold connexion . Let me be judged by my own actions , and not by the wilful falsehoods of a man ignorantly
ambitious .: . - ' ¦ . ¦ ¦•¦ : ¦ ¦ - ¦ ; ¦' ;• . . ¦ - ¦ ¦¦ ¦ ' . - '¦' ** This is the first time since my connection with Chartism that I have been called upon to defend myself from malicious abuse and misrepresentation ; and I will resist to the last the tyrannical conduct of men , even though they cloak themselves by the name of Chartists ; " I repeat—does any honest Chartist desire me to state correctly what I have done , and what course ; I recommend to be pursued , I will do bo with extreme readiness and pleasure ; but let me not be viewed through the darkened medium of other men's thick heads and black hearts . '' We have quoted the above vorbatiaj ; Italics , capitals , and all , are Mr . Philp ' s own ; and our
onl y reply to its blustering abuse is to refer the readers of Mr . Philp ' s paper to all that we have written upon the matter in the last two Stars . We here repeat every word we have said upon the matter . On the 12 th we said : — " We refer with great pain to the proceedings of the conference of Bath , between the Sturge Declaration men and some leading Chartists of that city . We respect Vincent for his zeal , his talent , and his suffering in th « cause , a > s highly as we respect any man ; wo believe him to ba thoroughly
honest and vyell-intentioned , but we cannot but regret the position he has taken in this business . Still more do we regret to see joined with him Mr . Philp , a member of the People's Executive . Doubtless these gentlemen give the new converts to Complete Suffrage credit for a large amount of honesty and sincerity . We cannot do so ; and we fear , it the people should be led into any general countenance of the steps taken by these gentlemen , that the error will not be found to be leas fatal for having been an amiable one . "
Last week , on the same subject , we had the following observations : ^ - 11 We repeat j as we said last weeki that we respect these men for the talent and the zeal they have hitherto manifested in the people ' s cause ; we respect some of them for the sufferings they have endured ia the cause ; but we cannot in this case compliment their judgment . We doubt not that they err from the exoes 3 of their anxiety to seize every opportunity of making converts to the Charter , and from their readiness to estimate the motives of others by their own , and eo to give the middle-class Sturgemen full credit for sincerity in their profession of Universal Suffrage principles : they suppose them to be sincere in wishing for Universal Suffrage , and that , therefore , they can easily persuade them into
the adoption of the other points of the Charter . We think them much mistaken ; and we still opine that their error will not be found less fatal for being amiable . We feel some little difficulty in finding out the plane upon which the amiable principles of our friends operate . We are at a loss to know how they discover , in their " Declaration , " aDydistincfcand unequivocal recognition of the principle of Universai ^ Sot ^ rage ; and if that recognition were even . palpable , we are astonished that they , some of Whom have suffered bo much from middle class treachery to principle heretofore , can hare so simple a dependency on their adherence to ptinciplei now * We find in Mr . Philp ' s speech ; at the Conference , a 3 reported by Himself , the following sentiment : — ¦ ¦> - ¦ ¦ ¦"¦ ¦ v ¦ /;" . rv . ' ; - . ; v , ¦ - . . ; v . ..
** ' But suppose the worat- ^ -th aiihe middle olagses were not honest;—that they signed ' this declaration as a false pretence ; --could they ever again sit in jury boxes and convictus as traitors and conspirators for contending for that principle which they themselves hid declared in Waok and * prhite io be tneright of the pebple . ' : ¦ . ' . ¦'•¦;¦¦ . '¦ ¦' - ' - -Y ' ¦ "' ¦ .: ; "¦' . ¦' / -. V . ^' - > :. ' - " -
©0 %&Eaur& Anur Cotte^Wntrentjaf*
© 0 % &eaur& anur CotTe ^ wntrentjaf *
Untitled Article
4 : v Tli E /^ - ^^ Y- - ¦¦ ' , . ; ,. . - / - Y . ¦ - . ; •¦' ¦ . ' . ¦¦¦ : i : ' : r- ' :-
-
-
Citation
-
Northern Star (1837-1852), March 26, 1842, page 4, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct423/page/4/
-