On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
—¦ . - ¦ r~i '• '¦ ' '—' r- ! : ¦ ' ¦ f ...
-
THE PARROT PAJPERS.—JSToIII . . Second Series.
-
THE PARROT DISCOURSES OF MR. CHARLES. HO...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
—¦ . - ¦ R~I '• '¦ ' '—' R- ! : ¦ ' ¦ F ...
—¦ . - ¦ r ~ i ' '¦ ' ' — ' r- ! : ¦ ' ¦ f i . ¦ . ¦ , . n . r .. . ¦ ¦ - . 1 ... . . - . ... . - ^—„ October 2 , 1869 , 3 THE TOM AHA WK . 157
The Parrot Pajpers.—Jstoiii . . Second Series.
THE PARROT PAJPERS . —JSToIII . . Second Series .
The Parrot Discourses Of Mr. Charles. Ho...
THE PARROT DISCOURSES OF MR . CHARLES . HOW THE PARROT - WAS FIRST ATTRACTED TOWARDS HIM . REMINISCENCES OF MR CHARLES ' S CHILDHOOD . HIS BENEVOLENCE . HIS KINDNESS TO ANIMALS . HIS PLEASANT LITTLE WAYS WITH DOGS AND CATS . MR . CHARLES ' S FATHER . HIS CHARACTER . A NOBLE-HEARTED FOOL . —HIS DEATH . MR . CHARLES ' S LEGACY . —WHAT HE DID WITH IT . Mr . Charles is rather a remarkable character . He is a favourite watched his of mine career . with I have great known interest him . from I first childhood took a , and liking have to him sugar on when account nobod of a very ingenious y , and then habit , at he the had first of opportunity stealing my , drawing the attention of his parents to the fact that " poor Polly had got lied no so sugar that , I " was upon no which loser the while want I could was at not once but liberall admire y the supp ingenuity , but with also which a character Mr . Charles , for benevolence thus obtained to which not onl he y li my certainl called the ghted dogs sugar y had and the -hearted way but cats in . which and very His was father sl he ight treated was claim fond one those .. of I of these was desp those also icable low , sill much creatures y animals peop de - . , Master good Charles obtained , the very reputation of being very fond of them of fascinating too . In animals fact , it was . I said knew that the he secret had of a wonderful that fascination power . When one of no the one dogs was or cats looking and , pull Master its tail Charles , twist would its paws get , p hold inch it , prick tion of its ears misery , and . otherwise But before divert peop himself le he was with all the blandishment contemplaand affection for the " dear creatures . " I never had such a crawling thorough towards contempt him for cring dogs ing until and I wagg saw these their wretched tails , quivering beasts with covered fear them while with the kisses amiable and boy overwhelmed —he was onl them y eight with years caresses old- . " I never saw a child so fond of animals "— " quite marvelloushow weak they -minded love him father ! " would the people ive him would some exclaim coin , and as a Charles reward ' . scratch The cats their were heads not quite and so bad g while , but he even did they it . Onl used I to knew let him to these myself creatures one reall day , y when dreaded purr a new and dog hated , not him understanding ; and y I chuckled Mr . never Charles forgot ' pleasant it , and little while ways he , pretended bit him thro to ugh forgive the hand , and . said He the the poor poison dear of which thing did it died not two mean days it , afterwards I saw him in give fearful the agony beast . h A as promising fulfilled the child promise Mr . Charles of his earl was y , and years . I think happy I may to say say he , for without mation any of his vanity character , that I . have had a good deal to do with the cleve I understand r man . In that fact Mir he . was Charles a celebrated ' father was author considered . He certainl a very had of his not death the p b leasure ut it has , m enerall y acquaintance been rema till rked within that his few latter years y what works I were could by , far improve his best g his . sty The le y . infer One ence insuperable is manifest obj . ection I did was I had th to e moral his writings tendency —which of » them were . not He devoid was what of merit you — men and that call the a philanthrop same object ist , . to Nearl relieve y all the misery poem of s and the poor prose a works nd the unif o fortunat n h statesme e had e . made This n , he pretty was might very verses hav weak e about got . some If the he Royal had prize written in Famil a public y panegyrics , he office might ; hav authors e got he a berth might at hav Co e urt got ; if mor he e favourabl natter e ed reviews his broth of his er pet books weaknesses ; , if he had of mankind andered , he might public have taste been , and a very praised popular the benevolence author . But , and he was the a fool cred ; he espo had nsibility ideas about autho goodness rship , which and ruined him . I have heard him spoken of—after his death , never held before fearlessl —as a noble y on the -hearted path which man , who he knew through to be much the evil right report one ; tion who of never selfishness raised his who voice loved in defence his fellow of - tyranny creatures or not in for justifica what - gentle he could heart get ; from who ; them was ambitious , but from not the of fulness the praise of his of generou men but s , onl of their y conveyed gratitude in ; a who look , took of a more poor pride and wretched in the simp man le thanks , than , in if fool trie . encomiums He never of could the rich see and misery the without mighty letting . I repeat the , si he ght was of it a
of make the him poor wretched without . shedding He never tears could . Contemptible think on the driveller sufferings I worry must could not call himself make him . his ab It out books did a not lot go pay of throug . dirty What h starving several was the editions brutes good ? . of They Wh his y did not he write novels with a spice of immorality in them ? done Why , did and not pro he duce get popular into favour pieces with , full managers of vulgar , jokes as his and son pretty has women ? That ' s what pays . I have no patience with such folly . He However always , I treate don't d want me to with speak resp harshl ect . y I believe of Mr . he Charle dedicated s' father a . poem to me . It began , — " Oh Make , beauteous Heaven more bird , whose heavenl notes y—" of loving praise at I forg last et he the died rest in . harness However as , he men went on and slaving when and he slaving was dead till , say ; , they people had found had out amongst " what them a great , without and good knowing man he it or was honou , and ring that him obituary ever , illumined one notice of the this of purest his dark father and and perfectest , dismal written earth b poets y Mr . " . whose Charles I quote genius , to from whom has an his property father they left the have copyri turned ght out of all to be . works , —and a very valuable But his father left Mr . Charles something more valuable still . Ms It was name not . his On " that noble Mr heart . Charles , " it was has not traded his " to genius some ; " it was . all His the father editors was of scarcel newspapers y in his and grave magazines before he to wrote say " round purpose in what to distress" his dear and honoured father had " left his family , morning and how till on him night had to devolved provide the for sacred them , duty not the of labouri luxuries ng which from they His father had known , he regretted in happ to ier say days , was , but the very bare imprudent necessities man of , and life . than was far Mr too . Charles liberal who with had his drawn money his . " father No one into knew all kinds that better of extravagance sick denied himself le and on every his fellow , account comfort -authors . and . Besides The luxury number , the in order sill of idle old to rascals hel man p poor had he used Charles peop to , feed I felt from sure his , would hardl not y-gained imitate earnings him in this was point fearful . I . heard Mr . press famil one of the these circle Mr satisfaction . , productions Charles and I could was with of ! which I Mr never hel . p Charles I saw drawing regarded read si a it few . out of What corks aloud a to to after joll the ex y - humbug his father ' s death . I got everything I wanted any gns , that ' poverty s all I know . appeal If I had , of not course , I should , ended have with made a request a pretty for fine some row literary . Mr . emp Charles loy- ' ment by working , however on small the softness and however of human poorl nature y remunerated , which is , and always so ready to help a man after he is gone , he got a good deal of work on £ 2 the 000 newspapers a earout ; of and which a very he nice allows income his sisters he makes £ ioo now between —about earns them , . , he And y always while , tells he takes them care " that not he to is let very peop poor le ; know , but what he tries he of to unbounded do something liberality for his on poor his sisters part . , " which gives them an idea Mr . Charles knew the value of his father ' s name . " Charles Marvel" signed in . full at the bottom of a copy of verses or a little lectio essay could , ns not brought . hel The p name believi the reader was ng , however so ' s mind associated co at mmon onc with e yery -place genius charming the , verses that recol you or - essay might seem , that there was really something in them . M r . judg must Charl e have es fr om made his not works his the father man , which to shudder overlook I have in his been this advantage stud to yi see ng , the a tely rub , , it - bish to which his name was put For I grave will say this of old you Marvel , M , r . what Charles ever he does wrote not care was first ; so -rate long of as its he kind gets . paid But , he , bless will father write anything , I wish he . had He not often been says with such a a sigh genius , " — Ah for ! my I know poor dear how inferior my poor talents must seem to his , and people can ' t help comparing understand us twice . " But as much , all the as his same father , Mr . was Charles making make when s now he , I when died . it But pays , Mr to . Charles seem so is . not He a puts philanthropist his feelings — in or , his at least pocket , onl , if y will he has do any reall good y got to any anybody . He never else j thinks so long whether as it brings what him lie money writes his I shall conscience have something is at ease more . I repeat to say about again , him I like in my Mr next . Charles . .
-
-
Citation
-
Tomahawk (1867-1870), Oct. 2, 1869, page 157, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/t/issues/ttw_02101869/page/9/
-