On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
cable to the absorption o £ stock for the reduction of the national debt . Large purchases , also , had been previously made in anticipation of the prosperous figures that were to be communicated , and a slight tendency to reaction was , therefpre , to be expected . "
CUSTOMS BEFOBM . This important subject , forming a necessary supplement to the Budget , was treated by Mr . "Wilson , on Thursday , when he announced some important alterations of the existing system , of which the following is a summary . Tho first topic related to the constitution of the Board of Customs , with regard to which subject the Government had not yet arrived at a decision . "With regard to the second topic , relating to the appointment and promotion of Custom-house officers , the Government recommended that facilities should be given to enable officers belonging to the humbler departments to enter those of a higher orade : and thev accordingly proposed , that when a
superintending locker ( or any other subordinate officer , aa he subsequently explained ) should have served for three year 3 j he should be entitled to undergo an examination , and become eligible for the higher ranks . The next point related to fines and satisfaction . With regard to fines , the Government could recommend their abolition , but they distinctly put an end to the principal evil complained of , by abolishing the interest at present enjoyed by the particular officers in fines and justifications , or from the sale of goods detained for duties . Ad valorem duties had also received the attention of the committee . These duties the Government considered might be eventually removed altogether , and the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his budget had acted in accordance with that belief . With regard to the
complaints relating to seizures and stoppages , and adjudications thereupon , he reminded the House that the Board of Customs had given directions that no vessels should be seized or stopped without a written notice to the owner , stating the grounds of the detention : and also that any person having his goods detained , or any complaint lodged against him , should be heard in open court , before one of the commissioners , the witnesses on both sides being examined on oath . With those arrangements , as far as London was concerned , the Government entirely concurred ; they were , however , inapplicable to the outports , where the Government proposed to supply their place by providing that such inquiries should take place before the authorities of the port where the circumstances might arise . The law of costs and penalties next received his attention . Taking- into consideration the complaints urged
upon this subject , the Government proposed that only when the Crown succeeded in a prosecution should it have a claim for costs—an arrangement by which the Crown was placed upon an equality with the subject . That in all cases not involving a sum of more than 100 ? ., it should be imperative on the Crown to resort to the County Court , or some other local tribunal , leaving the option with tho defendant to remove the case into a higher court if he thought fit ; and that cases involving a larger amount than 1002 . might be decided by local tribunals under certain circumstances . Also , that every action should be brought in a regular manner , by the ' Board of Customs , and not by the particular officers concerned in the case ; and that the limit of time allowed for bringing the action for damages should be extended to one month after the determination of the case . One of tho recommendations of the committee related to
tho question of transit . According to an arrangement which had been tried successfully for two years , all goods coining to the country in transitu , might bo landed , placed on the railway vans , and carried , under the superintendence of a Custom-house officer , to another port , and there r > :-exportod without ever having been touched . The Government were sensible that every facility should be given to our shipping to become the carriers of tho world ; and they had recommended tho Commissioners of Customs accordingly . Tho committee recommended that similar facilities should bo given to coasting vessels ; but this course ( except in the case of goods that had been examined ) tlio Government considered would bo attended with great danger to tho revenue , and unjust to fair traders . They al « > recommended that arms should not be carried backwards and forwards without an order from tho Treasury . With
regard to another recommendation ol tho committee—that a vossol should not bo stopped for smuggling , unless ono of tlio principal officers was implicated in the offonco—ho thought that tho c . iso was inot by tho existing law , but was willing to deal with it it' necessary . Objections had been made to the present bonding regulations , to moot which the Government proposed that tlio importer bIiouM bo liublo for duty ; but that , in parting witli Iuh goodu bo niight re-enter tliom , that thoy should then be r <> -measured , weighed , or guupfod , as tho euso mig ht be ; and that tho importer should then bo responsible only for any deficiency which niight—from whatever cause have taken place during tho period of bondage . Tho ( jovernment also proposed tliut tho Hoard of Customs should bo obliged to take stock periodically ; and that tho three classes of warehouses existing at present should all
b <» united into ono class . Taking into consideration tho inconveiiienco complained of with regard to tho examination of luggngo , tli (> y propound that in all oasoH whore-only ono or two packages were concerned , tho examination might take place on tlio steamboat between GmvoHond and London , and that in any case one paekugo might bo examined , ho that the passenger might bo enabled to pursue his journey without delay . The next point was a very important ono , relating to facilitating tho entrance of free goods . Tho committee recommended that the tdiip ' s manifest ,, and tho on try of tho consignee should bo Bent to tho landing waiter aw tho solo authority on which ho should ¦ uit ; but this Hyutom , he contended , would bo giving an impunity and encouragement to smuggling , which would bo productive oi" tho iuohI dangorouu conttoquoncos . They prououou , Uowcvur , aa fur ua pouaiblo , to moot tho objecta
of the committee , by having a room specially set apart for tho examination of free goods . Those were the principal recommendations of the Government , who proposed to include all Customs regulations in one general bill , lney also proposed ( pending the settlement of the question ot the construction of the Customs Board ) to give to Liverpool a privilege demanded by its increasing importance ; namelyf power to its local authorities to decide , without appealing to the fioard , in all cases not exceeding 10 W . The last proposition related to certain changes in the Isle of Man , by the abolition of the licensing system ; to raise the rates of duties upon spirits ; and to permit importation to any extent whatever . A general and approving conversation followed . Mr . Wilson presented some papers , which were ordered to
be printed . NATIONAL DEBT BILL . The House having resolved itself into a Committee , last night , upon the South Sea and other Annuities ' Commutation Bill , on arriving at the second clause , which provides that proprietors of the South Sea Stock and other minor 3 per cent , stocks may for every 1007 . receive S 21 . 10 * . new 3 § per cents ., or 110 Z . new 2 per cents ., both guaranteed for forty years ; or an Exchequer bond for 100 Z ., bearing interest at 2 f per cent , until 1864 , and 2 \ per cent , until 1894 .
Sir F . Keily characterised the whole scheme contained in the bill as inconsistent , impracticable , mischievous , and unjust ,, and declared he should oppose this part of it , as making a large and substantial addition to the national debt , under circumstances winch led to a reasonable apprehension that the principle would be applied to the whole debt , unless Mr . Gladstone consented so far to modify the bill as to strike out the second alternative . The alternatives , he contended , were not equivalent , and the Government should have proceeded , like preceding Administrations in similar cases , to invite tenders , instead of which , they had
framed propositions upo n dataof their own , foundedupon assumptions of what would be the state of the moneymarket in after years . If there was no other objection to the scheme than that it augmented the capital of the debt—a proceeding wholly unjustifiable , except in extreme emergencies- —it would be insuperable . He repudiated the theory of Mr . Gladstone , that what was termed the national debt consisted of perpetual annuities , observing that , if this were true , it was immaterial whether the capital of the debt was 5 OQ , 0 O 0 , OOOZ . or
1 , 000 , 000 , 0002 . ; but to add 10 per cent , to a portion of the nominal capital , which it would be necessary at some time to pay off in full , was a great injustice to the country . Independent of this objection , he argued that the disparity between tbe alternatives No . 2 and No . 3 was fatal to the scheme . Aware of the object in view , to create a 2 \ per cent , stock , he felt the great importance of not increasing the capital of the debt , aiid called upon the Government to expunge the second alternative .
The Chancbilor of the Exchequer observed , that the views of Sir Fitzroy were based upon a fallacious theory of monetary affairs , differing altogether from those upon which the Government had framed this bill . As to striking out one of the alternatives , it would be most unfortunate , he said , if Parliament sltould send him to the money-market with a maimed and impracticiible scheme . Sir F . Kelly had supposed that the scheme was to be applied to the whole debt . But it was not so ; tho object was only to establish a 2 } per cent , stock . It was objected that the three alternatives were not equivalent ; but their relative values
depended not merely upon figures , other elements entering into the calculation . The Exchequer hondct would not suffice to establish a 2 ^ per cent , stock , and that was tho reason why the new 2 | per cent . waB created . ) Vith regard to the alleged increase of the capital of tho debt by the latter expedient , which Sir F- Kelly supposed to be a violation of a great constitutional principle , tho opinion that tbe capital of the debt should not bo increased was a useful one , in which ho was ready to concur , but the debt was constantly receiving accretions without opposition , and no alternative bud been presented to him except tho second named iu tbe bill—• tho emit ion of a guaranteed new 2 ^ per cent , stock ut a premium—which would lmvo attained the object of
establishing a 2 , \ per cent , stock with a loss ) augmentation of tho nominal capital of tho debt ; but ho nuggcsLed Unit tlio annual . saving of 5 . v . per 100 / . from tho conversion might bo po . stponoil , and applied to tho extinction of the capital added to tho debt . Mr . T . IlAitiN < i protested against any addition to tho capital of tlio debt , and thought that this was not exactly tho moment for a permanent reduction of tho interest , and , if it hud been , that the modo proposed , tho leading fciil urea of which lie cursorily noticed , was loo complicated , while in tho time of our prosperity it would add to our liabilities and engagement *) . Tlio scheme , iu tlio whole mid in ifcrt partw , wiw reviewed by Mr . W . Williamb , Mr . LaINO , Captain
Laffan , Mr . J . B . Smith , Mr . J . A . Smith , Ifr . Hums , and ! other hon . members . Mr . Piseaeii observed , that the plan of the Government , if completed , could , at the utmost , save no more than 60 O , O 00 Z . a-year , with a guarantee that might entail a loss , and contrasted very unfavourably with preceding financial arrangements , especially in respect to the guarantee , the most important feature of the present plan . He objected that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had settled , the terms of the operation , whereas it was his duty to have thrown upon the public creditor the responsibility of offering terms . A 2 % per cent , stock could be created at any time ; its policy depended upon terms and time , and , in his opinion , Mr . Gladstone ,
though ingenious , had been premature . The prospects of the rate of interest were uncertain ; new phenomena were hourly appearing , and although before these changes , which had confounded the greatest financiers , the most successful of our Chancellors of the Exchequer had never contemplated a guarantee beyond twenty years , a guarantee of forty years was now proposed for a conversion which , if perfectly fulfilled , would save only 600 , 000 Z . a-year . Under these circumstances , he entreated the Committee to pause before it sanctioneel , nofc a measure of necessity , but a financial caprice , which , even that night , was still undergoing important modifications , showing that the scheme had not been sufficiently matured ; and he recommended the Government to give the subject more time and
thought . Mr . Goulbtten accused Mr . Disraeli of endeavouring , in his anxiety to depreciate the plan of the Government , to give fallacious representations of former financial operations . With respect to the guarantee , in proportion as advances were made in the reduction of the interest of the debt , corresponding advantages must be given to reconcile parties to the sacrifice . The government , with the view of creating a 2 ^ per cent , stock , were right in offering alternatives , the public creditors being of different classes ; and as to the alterations made in the plan , none of them infringed its principle . He trusted the Committee would assent to the Bill , which would lay a foundation for future reductions of the debt . Sir J . Pakington cited a speech of Mr . Goulburn in 1844 , which was in apparent incongruity with his present sentiments . Sir F . KEiiLT made a brief reply , and , upon a division , his amendment was negatived by 234 against 175 . All the clauses were then agreed to . DOCKYARD APPOINTMENTS . The manner in which the late Government managed the dockyard appointments was discussed on Tuesday . Sir B . Hall introduced the subject , stating that his object was to show , that the Tory Government had , in view of the late general election , improperly exercised their dockyard patronage . The following were tho facts of the case . In February , 1847 , the then Admiralty ( Whig ) had addressed a circular to the dockyard officers , pointing out many-shortcomings in the general workings of the establishments , compared with private yards , and attributing this state of things to tho manner of promotion : the rise from shipwright to leading man , and from leading man to inspector , was regarded rather as a matter of accident or favour , than as a reward duo to merit , and to be dispensed upon plain ancj o ] uitable principles . They therefore laid down certain rules , whereby promotion would be made in a regular way , according to merit ; and , to further this , they gave up their own power of direct appointment , vestinjg the consideration of vacancies , promotions , and changes , in tbe Surveyor oft tho Navy , making him responsible for all expenditure . Increased efficiency , and a saving of 190 , 000 ^ . a year , resulted from this movement . When tho Derby Government camo into power , a change took place . Five weeks after their accession , when a general election was monthly expected , Mr . S tafford , Secretary to the Admiralty , told the Surveyor of tho Navy , Sir Baldwin Walker , that his " political friends" were dissatisfied at the manner in which the
dockyard promotions were mtulo . A few days after , Mr . Stafford issued an order , cancelling the arrangement winch committed tbe consideration of vacancies to the Surveyor of the Navy , and directing that tho old plan of consideration by the Admiralty itself should bo reverted to . Sir Uuldwin Walker , taking tho verbal complaint , and this retractation of tho patronage , m an imputation on hiH conduct , tendered his resignation . With reference to this ottered resignation , another Admiralty circular wua issued . It stated that no imputation on Sir Huldwin Walker was intended by the former circular , that tho rules of 1847 , regulating promotion by merit , were to bo strictly adhered to , but that tho Admiralty itysolf , and not tho Surveyor of tlio Navy , would carry them into execution . Acting on this change , tho Dor-
Untitled Article
3 88 THE
LEADERrSATPgBAg ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), April 23, 1853, page 388, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1983/page/4/
-