On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Analysis ofLaughter. 19

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Analysis Of Laughter

    quisite . Such incongruities may arise , either by the discovery of the importance of supposed triviality , or by the detection of the triviality of what at first was apprehended as

    important . The surprise at dignity emerging from meanness is of a very different character from surprise at the emergence of meanness from dignity , ' and this last alone is the object of the ludicrous . Ulysses in the

    guise of the beggar , and Conrad throwing off the garb of a suppliant Dervish , are certainly no ludicrous images . The reduction of the blustering Parplles , the exposure of the

    turnip-head and sheeted-stake which usurped the terrors of the supernatural , produce the light revulsion , which is a case in point . It is no objection to this , that laughter is excited when we witness some

    surprises at circumstances which had been undervalued ; as the surprise of the _" beardless vain comparative / ' whose smooth pily advances meet with a snappish rebuff , or of the worthy Greek professor who laboured to secure his cellar from

    intruders , and nailed himself in . Here , it is true , the more important circumstance is the agent of the contrast ; but its importance is below serious estimation ; the elements of the

    contrast differ in degrees of _triviality , rather than in degrees of dignity or consequence . Where the rebuff a mortal blow , did ; the mistake of the D . D . cause his starvation , the alter-

    Analysis Of Laughter

    nations would fail to produce the ludicrous surprise , that is to say , being no jokes , they would not be laughable . True , indeed , it is , that in some circumstances of mis

    education—cases of the ill arrangement of associations—no contrast , which reaches not the individual immediately , is too serious for laughter ; a savage general laughs at the quivering limbs of his executed

    prisoners , and calls for music to these dancers ; a savage mob laughs loudly at the grimace of idiotcy or madness . But these contrasts , though laughed at , are not _therefore ludicrous ; their ultimate character is one

    and constant , though different minds take in but parts of their relations . The charges of immoderate affection for a quibble have been brought against Shakspeare on account of the jests which he puts into the mouths of some of his characters in

    their deepest distress ; and these charges have been sufficiently answered by the fact , that the distresses do give vent to such imaginations ; that the characteristic is true to nature

    observation vouches the fact , and it is curious to trace its origin in the laws of mind . That men on the scaffold , of iron nerves , who " go to their

    graves like beds , " should jest in undissembled gaiety ; that men less hard should jest in bravado , and others to mask agitation , are cases easily understood ; but if the prevalence of passion

    Analysis Oflaughter. 19

    Analysis ofLaughter . 19

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 1, 1837, page 19, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/mrp_01071837/page/17/