On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    lized . That verse is retained , witheut the slightest intimation that it was never written h ? Greek s till 1300 years after the epistle was itself written . On

    examining several other passages , where svstein has no concern , it appeared thai the text of Griesbach is in no way followed , where it leaves the Received Text . The fact therefore is , the Editor has employed Wets tern and

    Griesbach as furnishing him with a cornet view of the Received Text , and no further ;—and that this edition is nothing more nor less than a re-impression of Elzevir ' s Text , of 1624 , with all its indisputable departures from The original writings of the Aposties and E , aanir lists . in We cannot but express our astonishment , that any man of learning should superintend , and an ArchbisLcp sanction , an edi-

    Untitled Article

    tion of the N . T . containing a passage ( to leave others out of consideration , ) which no one of common critical information can hesitate , in admitting to he a 46 gross interpolation . " We deep * ly regret that this edition is a stereotype , as false readings will now be perpetuated : and we make these remarks partly with a view to enter our protest against the unjustifiable use which Dr . Dakins has made of the names of Wet ^ tein and Gries b ac h ; * and partly to save the money and prevent the disappointment of such

    or our readers as might be tempted b y its false colours to purchase the work .

    As to the Prolegomena , of which we have examined more than enough , . we find nothing valuable in . them , and much that displays great want of critical research .

    Untitled Article

    384 ? Review . —Improved Version of the JKew ' Testament .

    Untitled Article

    Art . II . The New Testament , in an Improved Version ^ upon the JZa ^ is of Archbishop Neivome ' s J S ' cio Translation : with a corrected Text ) and Notes Critical and Explanatory . Royal 8 vo . pp . 640 . Two Maps . 16 s . 18 G 8 . J . Johnson aad Longman and Co . X * ondon . [ Concluded from p . 2 S 1 . J According to the plan which editors . 4 . Critical notes , justiwe laid down in p . 10 1 , we now fying the reading or the translaproceed to offer some remarks on lion . 5 . Explanatory notes havtbe Notes . in this important work , ing no direct doctrinal tendency * These may be considered in the 6 * . Explanations of those passages following classes : 1 . Ncwcome ' s which are regarded by the oppojrenderings , where others have nentb oi Unitarianism , as proofs of jbeen preferred in the text . 2 . Ren- their opinion ^ . derings which the editors appear With respect to the first class , to regard as possessed of consider- we have here little to object . Jusable foundation ,-and which are , ticc to the excellent Translator , they s » y in some cases , more required the specification of those eligible" ( Introd . § I . ) than those instances in which the I , V . dcin the text . 3 . The readings of parted from his renderings ; and the Received Text where it is Jeft , the cases in which it has accidentcither by Newcome or by the ally been omitted , we have al »

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1809, page 384, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1738/page/30/