On this page
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Almighty be sacrificed to make satisfaction ? We speak not in ridicule , but ^ itog sgj ^^ fomitpi to r . n ^ oi &"vjmq >^( flg » PteiSefif Jfeftfitt / tfe ^ eJ < ral * t , grilk Ja )^ pti ^ W l id bid to iKe arguwa ^ t which we have examined , bfehokliit tfous ejaisily ^ i ^ etsckii 4 f ) tfoi against an Infinite Being be infinite , satisfaction offered to-an Infinite Being must ( by a parity of reasoning ) be also infinitei ^ :. ' &wvwh viand ismann The argument therefore runs ^ thus : ¦¦ . a . -. <*¦;!¦>•> phI , ti : MWix $ .. .
Satisfaction to an Infinite Being atones for infinite sin , i \ f awe-Sin against an Infinite Being is infinite sin . Consequently ; satisfaction to an Infinite Being atones for sin against an Infinite Being . > ¦ t * ' ' *' - * ¦ ' As , therefore , the sin was the sin of man , so let the satisfaction be the punishment of man , which alone reason demands and justice accepts , made infinite by being committed against an Infinite Being . ' ¦ . .. , . ' . '!; . ¦ ¦ :. ¦ - ¦ . / .: ¦ > '• ' . , ¦> : '¦ . ¦ ' '¦ ' lir ' iM » ' . . . /' . i . . - - * - . jf ;' - i < . ' - » V ! ~ ^ .. iv tl" > -. ' . ; . ' , .. ¦ . "• . ' . . .. - ; ¦ . ¦ ! , ( , ¦ «; .,-., ¦ j * r ¦ ¦ < * .. tf > - » jf ntigmfI , ww » ^ i £ ¦ - * . ; ^ ts ; -MS t ; : / 1 : <; \ :. ; .. ; ' .
Untitled Article
... ¦ .,. Silly ., < hf ? q b jsbiii ? . f-x-0- rf ; boO * ws ? bV ¥ ^ '> ^ t i ? h . / ^• ¦^ ^ l . i- > n >^> i Althou ^ i ^ ^ q remark which tave ali ^ ady been subinitted to the r ^ fttlers of the Repo&i ^ y ^ iW ^ fepfyi ^ td $ & $ Elton's un ^ ej ^ K ^^^ k orf ) iU ) Oitan ^ thoitght to' hncv ^ J 3 ^> sufficient , andioaoreittenrattSiQbn ^ in raspect ' to the < Mportattcd bf tJfe ? 06 e # - iii
? d ( m , I , saafe ^ W ^ 4 «* 8 ^^«* ^ outsiudirfge ^ ee Ful filHhg im ^ ie ^^ fes ^ intention o | # Ji ^^ ¦ The autboivap | H ^ rft to m « tc > he guilty of a , wiint of candour in tiikrepttfanting * by irapl ^ atiaa , the ^^ inio ^^ ofcv ^ r ^ mmiy Unitavians ipi reftreTicc to the opening paragraph of John ' s Gospel . It ia ^ hfe »*^ hoi 4 in thfepfid iih pthei : pm ^^^ itm ^ tom ^^ -1 ^^ ^ turtmrimxtiHsniaii th ^> vitfyties
qnly pf ysnilt ^ an opinion which may be most suecessfuJly nift / d § vm } ea 4 ii % his xeader tq a ^ cit ^ fcic ^ e di ^ Bucb 4 r ^ t \ miknu ^^ immi ^ m ^ Mibdy If Borne distinguished Unitarian has puWidy defended » to 'Ky ^^ Vioti ^ t ^ i im&fitei&fi ^^ Mr ttdvattts ^ eoif ctlii ^^ il ^^^ L tire , he ebsurdly affecU to detach this champion altogether toft ^ u ^ ffea ^^ A tfMb 4--jwimin ^ tit ) : Jt ^ alily a Unitarian at all * Alihot ^ TO « &KdJW ^^
witness this contrQvertial stratagem played off upon us fr ^ jmMlwmffig ti'lii the case of various great men , who though avow ^ edly contenditig 1 ® HF \ # fle essential point of Unitatianism , the doctrine of One GodthvlWte ? , & \ di \ M ce ^ ai » ly jMiibr ^ e « sorae other vie ws com nion among vios i » iic ^^ * fe person of Chfist ^ 1 must confess I was a little surprised m ftnd ^ l ^ S ^ e ^ anoBuvr ^ applied io ih& illufctrious Lardner , the gmit'Orackvif any H ^ drVWttrfl W . so ,. ot ^ Wn Unitarianism , one of whose latest puWirtatWh ^ ^ fei «* ft # o ^ Me iU ^ w ^ i vraa written exprcssjy in refotatipn of tlfe ^ doetiiii « < rf *^ Glfi ? fi #% ixro * exi | 5 tettc 0 , or ^ in other words , in maintenance of t ^ at of h ^ ' «^ ^ fl
proper , hiunajMty . Yet Lardner , the autlior woukl rnsinwic ^ h mftffif chiWd , by ( Unitarians ! But the fact is , thnt Mr . Bltoiv ^ n » tt ^ j 3 ¥ ^ r it ocqaai ^ n ,, af >^ m tcx be willingly ignorant of what yjiitayiaftiim ^^« J } y im lofcljead ^ f tr ^^ H as consisting' m a certain view of thainatoW ^ fi < t ^ d ttild ^ e , pw <»^ oX Cteriat , ! he pteses ia a few pages frd ^^ l (^ mide * T i * few # tt ^§ pgi ^ , ^^ e ^^ Ui ^ a medley i » f heterogeneous opmk ) n % tfM ** mitktffa Urtay or »? fty not entertain , and al ^ niid e ^ h of which- ; Wiajf-be *^! hftV ^^^ W entertained by Trinitarians likewise . Is thifca worthy w ¥ Atte « kl ^ h ^^ ef d >/^ ppng ) i ^ p ^ fttfliqueaiioiiir -Is tto a . jast > or ciiaritable e »^ WB ^ iPiR ) r
Untitled Article
818 On Mr . Elton's Second Thoughts . _ . tt- ^ i ¦ = » r- --
Untitled Article
. ^^ j ^ OHiMluniMcw ^ weik ^ TfeMinAft ^ 'V } - ¦ ¦ ¦ * - ¦¦ ' ¦ "¦ " « "
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Nov. 2, 1827, page 818, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1802/page/34/
-