On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
* t carried him into a wilderness in vision , he could not be set out for Galilee before that descent
took place . " F . p . 7 l 72 . Thus inconsistent appear to be the two accounts of the time when , and the place where , our Lord \ va 9 thrown into a trance .
Perhaps what occasioned Mr . F / s falling into this inconsistency was , that he at first thought the side of Jordan , where the soirit side of Jordan where the spirit
, descended on Jesus immediately after he went up from the water , unlikely to be the place where the vision commenced , beinjj on
some accounts obviously unfa , irourablc to that steady and undivided attention of mind , which the scenes and business of the vision required}—such as its being the spot , where Jesus had been pointed out to the particular
notice of John , and probably of others , who could hardly avoid being struck with wonder and awe by the extraordinary phenomena they had witnessed—where there is no ground for supposing , that
people immediately ceased to assemble before they underwent or after they had undergone the rite of baptism—and , also , whore other circumstances would probably conspire to distract our Lord's attention * Our author
might therefore judge it necessary to suppose , that Jesus withdrew to some distance from Jordan before he Was thrown into the trance . But afterwards recollecting , that the effect of the descent of the
Spirit , whatever it was , followed immediately , and having determined that effect to be a , vision , he might slide unawares into the
* The word » principally referred to above arc **• r # t ? m& /« Tt / , Matt , ; < rt 4 Ty 4 yM « , Mark : trrm Triv / uartj J-ukc .
Untitled Article
other opinion , that no sooner had the Spirit descended than the vision began . —My next reason for being dissatisfied with Mr . F / s hypothesis is , II . Because he makes the temptation to have been a vision .
Accordingly , by your leave , I will go on to examine the force of his reasoning , from some expresions in the gospel history of the temptation being the same or of the same import with language
employed elsewhere in the sacred writings in describing indubitable visions , to prove that the evangelists , by using such language in their accounts of the transactions
in the wilderness , intended to be understood as speaking of a vision also . Now , though it be allowqd ^ that sevei ^ il passages quoted by Mr . F . particularly from theSep - tuagint translation . - * of Ezckiel , in which the same Greek words or
words of the same meaning occur as are found in the evangelical narratives of the temptation , are accounts of visions , yet it cannot be affirmed , ( nor does Mr . F * affirm , see p . 75 , 76 . ) that wherever those words are met with in
the Scriptures , they uniformly denote a vision . * And it may not be unworthy of notice , that in some of the passages quoted by Mr , F . from Ezekiul in confirma *
tion of the position , that in th « evangelists those words imply * , vision , the words in 'vision or in the visions of God are added , which latter words would havjt
been super ( luous if the writer had thought that the former without them necessarily denoted a i
Untitled Article
20 Objections to Mr . Farmer ' s Hypothesis
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1810, page 20, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2400/page/20/
-