On this page
- Departments (1)
- Text (4)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Art . I , EccksiastkalResearches ; or , Philo aud Josephus proved to be Historians and Apologists of Christ , of his Followers and of the Gospel . By John Jones . 8 vo . pp . 596 . ' Mawman . 1812 .
Mr , John Jones is well-known to our readers as a learned and laborious searcher into ecclesias ticai antiquity ; who with the ingenuousness and courage svhich so eminently distinguished Dr .
Priestley , communicates at once , and without reserve , the fruits of his researches to the public . It is not our province to decide peremptorily upon the numerous interesting inquiries which be
proposes to the Christian world ; t ) ut we feel it a duty to recommend his volumes to the perusal of such as are seeking truth , and are not stopped in their progress by the conceit that whatever is new must be false . He will of
course be misrepresented and censtired by that numerous class of men who hold , that in the church , 4 whatever is , is right ; " he has therefore a claim , which we trust will be practically allowed- upon
the notice of the friends of free inquiry . As the Ecclesiastical Researches contain much matter that is novel , and quite opposite to the judgment of the learned , we think it
right in critical justice to give a concise , analytical view of the work , so that our readers may judge for themselves . The principal object of the' v ^ ltime is to
prove that Philo and Josephus were not only believers in the gosptl , but historians and apologists of it and its professors among the Jews . The following are the arguments which Ml ' . Jones offers in support of thisliypothesis .
1 . The gospel is not a religion distinct from Judaism , but the soul , the essence of it perfected by Christ . It is the religion of Abra ^ - bam , of Moses , and the prophets ,
refined ^ spiritualized , and rendered interesting to all mankind ^ by stripping it of those rites which hitherto limited it to the Jews ! ,
This Mr . J . thinks is the notion which Jesus and his apostles had of Christianity ; and there is sufficient reason to believe that Philo and Josephus , when speaking of Judaism , always mean Judaism ; a £ it was carried to perfection by the Son of God .
2 . If these writers were not for Christ , they must have been against him . The claims of Jesus necessarily rendered every Jew an eti ^ my who was not subdued by-evi * dence to become his friend . Thfc
very existence of the Jewish community was involved in the question ; none , much less such exalted men as Philo and Josephus , who by their rank were called upon to take an active part in the distracted state of their country , could feave remained indifferent Or neutral .
if , therefore , they did not write with favourable views towards the gospel , they wrote with hostile views . From pride or policy they might not mention Jesus and hfe
( 48 )
« Still pleas'd to praise , yet not afraid to blame . —PbPE .
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1814, page 46, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2436/page/46/