On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
ological Seminary , who addressed to Mr . C . a , ' series of controversial
letters , which passed almost immediately through two * editions . " Mr . Stuart , " my friend says , * ' is one of the most learned , able and powerful supporters of what is deemed high orthodoxy /' These letters are very ably reviewed in an interesting publication , entitled " The Christian I > iseiple , " published
at Boston every two months , by Wells and Lilly . My friend adds , " probably there will l ) e more publications in this controversy ; indeed we are promised , perhaps I should say threatened , ¦ w ith a vindication of doctrinal points , in answer to Mr . C , by another
Andover professor . " Dr . H . regrets the personal asperities that too much mingle with this controversy , but hopes and trusts that , " like the storms and tempests that sometimes visit the American region , it may have a salutary tendency , and , dispelling dark and
noxious vapours , may leave the atmosphere niore pure , and let in the light of heaven through a clearer medium . " " We , " he says , " may see this light but partially diffused , yet , with good old Simeon , we may depart in peace ,
encouraged by the assurance that it shall not only shed more of its glories in our own iands , but also enlighten the Gentiles who now sit in darkness , and ultimately spread joy through the whole earth . "
In these sentiments , Mr . Editor , I am certain you will participate , and if vou think the facts to which they relate imiy be unknown to many of your readers , you will , by inserting them in the Repository , greatly oblige CATH . CAPPE .
law , and delivered ^ them up to . fee stoned . Btit those in > the eity mt > st distinguished for their probity a « Mi aecuorate knowledge of the laws ivem grievously offended at * this measure . " ? -
T he ground of the accusation brought against James was assuredly his belief in Jesus as the Messiah . Stephen maintained the same opinion . Ajad they said , " We have heard him speak
blasphemoiis words against Moses aad against God /* Acts vL 11 . We may be assured also that the other persons who suffered with James , suffered for the same reason . Moreover , since the enemies of James insisted that he
transgressed the law in holding forth Jesus as the Saviour , we are to infer that the men whom Josephus represents as most distinguished by their probity and accurate knowledge of , the law , and who were grievously offended at his death , had the same views of
Jesus with the apostle . These were such men as Gamaliel and the priests who became obedient to the faith , Acts vi . 7 . From this passage we may gather , that , in the dispute between the apostles and their adversaries , the terms
Gospel and Christianity were not employed . The sole question between the parties was , which of them rightly understood the laws of Moses . The believers in embracing the gospel , so far from professing a new or exclusive religion , professed only a more
adequate and refined knowledge of the Mosaic law . The writings of Jose - phus , in an eminent degree , illustrate this fact . In his immortal work against Apion he has given , under the title of the law . a beautiful delineation of the
gospel 5 and he asserts that , hi * his time , there was not a place , nor scarcely a family in the whole civilized world where it was not received .
Lardner and some other sagacious critics reject this passage of Josephus as a forgery , and one reason for the rejection is , that it gives an account-of the death of J ^ im ^ s different from that which , through Eusebitis , ( H . E . Lib . ii . C . 23 , ) we have received from He *
gesippus . But the two narratives me perfectly consistent witjh ^ each ? other , only that the Jewish historian ,, in his brevity , has oflflafcteci th& ! partfeulafrs related by the-others Josephus * does not say , as lia ^ feer represents Khn saying , that Ananus had James and
I > r . J \ Jones on the Acvoimt of the Martyrdom > of * JamM ty Jo&ephm . IB
Sir , JOSEPHUS lia ^ given a brief but important account of the manner in which tl ' ie Apostle James was put to death . It is to this effect , A . J . Lib . xx . C . 8 . § 1 : " The younger Ananus , who was made chief priest , was hanghty in his behaviour and
exceedingly daring * . He moreover ranked with the Sadduceea , who surpassed all the Jews in the cruelty of their judicial sentences . Ananus being thus disposed , summons a council of the judges , and biingtng before ft the brother of Jesus , catted Christ , whose tiame \^ as James , with some others , « e accuses them of transgressing the
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1820, page 15, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2484/page/15/