On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
tmtt in «^ ei » i Mfo * pattrfci £ v nor a * t ^ a ^ ybfe dtMOOtti m tte eerie * of tfaebr hftflen * ftp * at the GeotHe world , though fctien * fetia * the commonwealth of IstafcL AikV though the accounts , deplorable aa they * re > might be truly
given conccorni « gf many of tfee Jewish and Gentile nations , and even of Chris * tiaii nations to * , yet never without stfme particular exceptions . Andy incfeed , wbed , i » any ag : e of the world , suet universal characters of vice are
cbtettn by the saered wrfters , or by fl ^ ty writers , they generally refer not to all living , bjut to a certain great number of prefone perooFus appearing openly in rath titties and places . . The V € yry ^ fetovfriag' o £ sueh characters imftlies a very gre&fc sense of the
infMny of them in the breast of Mm vrfcerthtwrs thdm , who is , at least , sitppoeed himself to be an exception ; ajid not only an exception , but , by the detestation he expresses of this monstrous depraration , to be a real example of the contrary virtues .
• in the' account the Apostle Paul has givfen o £ the vices of the Heathens , ia the first chapter , no one cxn suppose that he meant to charge every ipm under the light of nature , wkh ail that black catalogue of heinous sins ; or that there were not in his esteem * instances ; of persons aaa € > ng then * innoeerrt of every one of them .
and <^ ve » eornmendal > le for all the contra * y virtues . And iu producinE ^ these cfeirftcter » of Jetv » frown Jewisli \ ¥ ri * tefs , be , doubtless ^ CI caumot doubt it myaetf , ) intended the same exceptvonff .
v All that I have endeavoured at , is to refprceeitf ; what appears to me the gtmime » enae and extent of such de-8 ti » ptaDa& as tlw ^ e in Scripture ^ that U » whomsoever they may be truly appbe <* > ( as , alas ! they are too often jttst t «« r far flrreater numbers set tf // jttst tr la * greater numbers set tf //
times than ehasity m&& virtue woitld wiehv ) yet they are aot to be taken foi ? the genuine and natural portrait of humtin ; natore , and tint universal ishmn ^ timaoi ait men , « rto in very ooirru | rt times and nat ^ ms- ; i Tofoititdflneneraldoi ^ riiiefteQncernv
i « g : humfett natiire ^ the work of Qod , ffrnn Hitch descrriptkm& of th « character of the great multitud&of vicious perfeon * , t » injurious to ihe Dirine B < Ang who formed U »^^ tho s oiiaft ^ of gloomy thoughts which terrier many
90 M and virtHodR ttMfite . Bb * Ifi deti ala ^ lrOm ; the trim meaning « nd i « op ^ ofitfie saerad writers I » ^ etferul the eathnatkHt attid ju 4 gna ^* t of the cb » ractera of ail Particular p »» c 44 a < $ & in
the hands of God , who will impute t ^> n £ man any evil but what he is truty g ^ Hty ; of ; who ® ee « , dktifictlv , the various decrees of virtue and vice \ rMeh aare in evevy n * ind and ) ife > and who will not c * epr © eiate or overWrok the least gooA that i ^ c « ltivate 4 and practised by any of hig nui ^ ital creatvtres .
It is repugmmr to thN ? forHngs of every well-dkpoeed mhtd , to form the most dl * ocki »^ Me aNT ef the charsu te ' r of its nature , TW bonmir of fA «>^ should be comtttfed tent the hm \ our oC its ^ reat Author ; ^ rwi tbougfe it be
found stadned vvhh apreat hupnrity , yet , let it ever b # held a sacred ttiith , that its depravatioft & wilful , and arises not froi » the neee ^ ity and ihk pulse of its divine formatkm ., but from the voluntary abuse and perverfeioa of its faculties . JAMES MANNING .
19 . ;; -:. " :- * ^ If ^ jkw ^^^ A ^^^* . -
Sir , Bristol , Nov . 1 * 1821 . WAS long of opinion * tl » at the I book of Joh was wrklei ^ by Mosea ; the argument * of » mny former writes appeared to xtm altoos * conduaire upan that head . I \\ uve been
lately reconsidering the vvfojeei , and think there ftre m ?* fiy » tron ^ reas ons to sriipport tl * e ^ oneUjdicfn , thai it was not produced earlier thai * the Babylonish oap&Mty , One of the chief of these ia , the maoMnertf Wrhiefe is employcad » s an introduction to the whole . By the mo&t iwlieious interpreters ,
thla 13 admitted to te altegomal ; the allegory , ho * re ? grv mxwt be derived from tha notiong entertained % the writ « 3 r or th © Mf « in whfeh the events are- supposed to bare tnkert pla ^> upon ; 8 « ch sufej ^ ctB . N ovr it appeals to me , that U Moses > ht * l be < m ^ ther of
the writer oi ? the 4 fottipil ^ r tM » pt ; r ^ y theistiout and Unitarian poem * and had known , or b * lierv d m the ejc&teflto trf auch a pow € « rfitl a ^ ent of evil as Satan i ^ here reare ^ etfted t ^
be , he would <« iti 4 ttty hwe tertrodueed him , byviUdifMV itiMwe aceouftt he h »» ^ f iven . ttS ^ of tfe * intWodttction © € sin into the woiOdr ihl ^ Yr ^ ttl ^ surel y * have he * mi m ^ te htie \ ngib } & m ^ pMttar * an | fu « g « iAt ^ th *^ HKMXthi of ** smlaal mm tever b&A fte pwvear of
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1822, page 10, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2508/page/10/