On this page

• Text (2)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    tioi * , * o WPi 4 & risque tut incurring it . ** ¦ ¦ ' ¦ ' ^ -- ' ' f " ¦ ' ' ¦ ' " "' '¦' ¦ ' I will aot , as J said above , take upon me to dstetTaiffe for aitotftelf ; biit I apprehend tile foUowihg considerations deserve to be weired hf one whom Providence calls to

    determine forhimself . But I must first premise , that I here go on the supposition , that the person deliberating has a previous persuasion that there is nothing absolutely unlawful in communicating with the Established Church ; and yet that it is not generally eligible , and so little so , that he has hot thought fit , at least of lfete . to do it , when no such

    occasion as its being a qualification for an office has occurred : for I suppose that if the contrary were either way the case , there would be now no such consultation about it . It must therefore be considered jut the present ease , whether the

    advantageous consequences attending a compliance , will cdunterb ^ lance the inconvenience which ipay probably result frbm it : X mean , not simply frota taking the communion at the Established Churdli , but taking it as a test . On the side of a compliance , 1 think

    thejmiH > ij > &lkrj ^ mentd kre these- 1 , The suppdrt whic ^ -tnay be gjvfen by this means on the one hand to the present Government , and on the other to the Dissenting icwse , wjii ^ h may be by rtiis more powerfully supported ^ 2 . The m 6 re effecttrai sunnrexsion of

    profaneness and immorality , by the authority to be thus acquired . I do not mention as a 3 rd argument the promoting of mutual caiidbiir between the Church and the Dissenters ; be * -

    cause , so f ^ r as I can observe , the churc h people are exasperated rather than conciliated by ' siucn compliances , and speak more tespectfully of those that decline them , than of those who

    gQ thus far , and no farther . On the other hand there are opposite aspects to be considered , whicli are of such weight that I confess they would etRictually discourage me , though I pretend not to mjake wy Tiews a standard for others in this case or any other . But it is necessary here to

    consider , and so far as may be to coin pute ,. V , Theinftuence that a com-Prance may have on countenancing , and so perpetuating , this grievous test vol

    Untitled Article

    : which bears so hard oft t « ttder con-^ t ' « f ^ nee ^ , and beyond * 11 cctottoter » f tends do much to the dishtmour of fisMgwn . In proportion to the ^ € j ? w ^ hi which I c # um ¦ wfeh td he rfjte to repeat it , I okigfit to b * 6 totfeu ^ * o ^ I encourage it . Notlmf ^ s ^ enas so likdy ^ way to break it as a rfe ^ lut © resistance : had the Dissenters lo a

    man refused to act urideiit , I befie * 0 the ministry would Ion ^ since have seen it necessary , everi for their owa security , to have abolished it . If it be said ; the number of plaees which woifld be affected one way or another is $ o small , as to be beneath th ^ no * tice of a ministry ; 'tis obvious to

    answer , that this overthrows the chief argument in favour of a compliance . Ministers of state can compute our comparative importance to them , bet * ter than we : and rf they think us df

    less importance than we really are ^ and by despisitig us huH ; th ^ mselires ^ as 3 ir Robert Walpole evidently did ^ they must thank themselves . Blessed be God , ttoe throne is not like to

    fall with any set of lpiaisters , and their ' successors may be wiser . Our fronds must consider , 2 , Tbe reproach which may be brought on the Dissenters by a supposed interested com * pliance one way ; as well as by an uinreasonable stiffness , the athet . P ^ -

    ple vrtll say , that it either does or does not violate consciences to cotnrtiiihtcatettritK the Established Church : if it does , wh y do we ever dolt ? If ifc does not , why do we keep up a separatiop ? Ai ^ d few will be intelHgetit or candid eriotigli to enter iijto the distinction between doing it occasionally

    and constantly ; or , knowing the meanness of the motives by wliich they themselves are governed , to believe ours to be so ndble and se pure as we pretend . 3 . The degree ia which a compliance may eiabolden some Dissenters or othsr ^ , t *> Ap ~

    proach the sacred ordinance in question merely on secular views , and to act as if they thought that what is sacred in it were annihilated when it is thus used . When I Iiave seen how readily perhaps a little place ha ^ brought some to that table at church , wlien ^ though in judgmeiit tl ^ y wiere Dissenters , no ednsitte ^ tion ; could

    prevail upon them t 6 enter into church coinmuittoii amongst us ; I oyvn I a ^ m inclined to lay no small str ^ on this ,

    Untitled Article

    Dissenters taking th ^ Sacramental Tes t . &B&

    Untitled Article

    . xx . 2 z

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), June 2, 1825, page 353, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2537/page/29/