On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
of the sacerdotal vestments , were worn , we are told , the one , that he might bear the iniquity of the holy things of the people ; the other , that when he went into and came forth from the holy place , he should not die . ( Exod . xxiii . 35 , 38 . ) Now , that such a virtue resided in the plate of gold , inscribed even as it was with Holiness unto the Lord , or in the mere semblance of the fruit and sound of the metal , could not surely have been for a moment credited by those who had been so clearly taught that Jehovah' dwelt not in images of silver or of gold , nor in any work of man ' s hands .
" To a people , too , thus instructed , the whole system of expiatory sacrifice must have appeared intelligible and reasonable , only upon the supposition of its being figurative or allegorical . Admitting readily , that even the most pious and spiritually-minded among them might be far from understanding the precise nature and full value of that great sacrifice which we ( neither
unscripturally , we trust , nor irrationally ) believe to have been thus shadowed out , we would yet contend that they must have regarded that which of a truth purged their iniquities , the iniquities even of their holy things , as somewhat far higher and more available than the blood of bulls ana goats , and the sprinkled ashes of the heifer . " %
We have no intention to enter into the question respecting the Jewish ideas of sacrifice , and will only oppose to Mr . Conybeare ' s presumption that tlie Jews must have had the notions which he attributes to thefm , the fact that from the first of their historians to the last of their prophets there is not a single passage which shews , or even seems to shew , that thdy attached any such opinions to a rite of which they were in the constant exercise . But as he says that circumcision is ' * expressly declared b y Moses to have a spiritual meaning , " it may be worth while to examine what it is the Jewish
Lawgiver really says . Circumcision was not of Moses , but of the fathers , and in the 17 th chapter of Genesis is declared to be the covenant ( i ; e * sign of the covenant ) between God and Abraham , that the land of Canaan should be given to his descendants and possessed by them , while they continued obedient . The command was renewed and incorporated with the law ( Lev . xii . 3 ) without a word being said of any spiritual meaning . But in his address to the people in Deuteronomy , Mose 3 twice exhorts them " to
circumcise their hearts ; " and this Mr . Conybeare calls an express declaration of the spiritual meaning of the rite . If this be an express declaration , may we not ask , what can be called an incidental allusion ; or if this application of it in a moral sense prove that it bore a secondary and spiritual meaning , why may we not say that it had a third and rhetorical meaning , since Moses declares himself to be " of uncircumcised lips" ( Exodi vi * 3 ( ty ; or a fourth and horticultural meaning , since he speaks of a tree being un * circumcised ? ( Lev . xix . 23 . )
Hitherto we have spoken generally of the doctrine of a double sense in the Scriptures of the Old Testament , but it is necessary to direct our attention more particularly to the subject of the historical * and prophetical types which are supposed to be so abundant in the law and the prophets . We must endeavour first of all , if possible , to acquire some distinct idea of whait is meant by a type . Mr . Conybeare gives no precise definition .
According to Mr . Chevallier , " one person is an historical type of another , when the real actions of his ordinary life designedly , by the providence of God , prefigure the real actions of the life of the person to whom' reference is made . " P . 30 ; If we further inquire how this design is to be ascertained ; we are told that " unless the Scripture has declared the connexion exists , we can never ascertain that any resemblance , however accurate , is any thing more than a fanciful adaptation , and we may go on to multiply imaginary
Untitled Article
Review , —Tite Bampton and Hulsean Lectures . 39
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1828, page 39, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2556/page/39/
-