On this page
-
Text (3)
-
1138 The " Publishers' Circular ig ^ ^ ^
-
but Libraries which in he the movement w...
-
YERE FOSTER versus MARCUS WARD & CO. I t...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
1138 The " Publishers' Circular Ig ^ ^ ^
1138 The " Publishers' Circular ig ^ ^ ^
But Libraries Which In He The Movement W...
but Libraries which in he the movement was small the volumes first , and secretary which his cordial . he As has co an published -operation author , Mr there in . Nicholson the are work not of wanting still the has Library traces the world of Association that befoTe scholar Lin of T || II n I
decide Bhip and the exactness knotty of points of criticism as to dates which and will authors stand which him in necessaril good stead y occupy is when much he is of called ch the attention upon to II I j the hat whiViia
may of of the tlift not chief ^ hiftf be disposed of the Bodleian Bo to dleian overlook . . T That , but Mr which . . Nicholson . Nicnolson , in such is a a a young voune case as man this , is a lauit fault perhaps wni near ch his akin se ** niors « to a virtue virtue , for lor if n there mere is is one one thing imng which which seems seems to to be ue certain ccl-muii m in the me future lumio uj of . the wie English joingusn Univo Univer »
¦ ¦ pared sitie f s it , for is changes ¦» that ¦ those - — - -j and who perh ¦— _ are - - ap - charge s - even - d for with attempts the care to of divert their various ancient institutions endowments must and -- »^ , ^ gifts be pi « to !
» ™ - ^ ^"" — — " — — — ——— — ^ n — — ^ _— f ^ . * vO Ml I I novel blind , and if not obstinate absolutely , adherent foreign ^ to uses stereotyped . In such fashions a day the but head rather of the he should Bodleian be ought a no an to wUHna be no ! I
time time to . adapt i , he lie nnds finds himself «• himself nimseii 1 « and . . his *• That mat institution Mr mr i » i . . mcnoison Nicholson to 1 the J *_ win will altered _ lj be » e aoie abl , circumstances e to to ooey ob ey J tne the inj inj in * unction unction which 1 * ^ , — — from * t ime . to B \ i !
, Rebus in arduis aequam memento servare mentem , I those in Oxford who during know him his University best will not career be inclined may be to accepted question as , and an the augury popularity of the which reception he gained which I I
will await him when he returns to the city I Tower crowned and girded with its silver streams , I
as Mr . Edwin Arnold beautifully put it in last Saturday's Athenxum , which is henceforth to be I
rus Home ana iiis worKroom . I
Yere Foster Versus Marcus Ward & Co. I T...
YERE FOSTER versus MARCUS WARD & CO . I trade This and case esceciallv , recentl to y decided in the Irish law If the i courts judgment , is one of ui of the tue very Master great interest of oi the Rolls ivo to the is I
trade , ana especially to lithographic ntnograpnic printers printers , . jli ne juagnieni -, xyxasoer x , ne us is II 11 to respectable be regarde firm d s as in final the , it lith would ographic appear business from to the be affidavits a decision of directl a large y opposed number of to the the rules most I I and practice by which they have hitherto been guided . le There are , h with owev which er , so many comp hers li- I
cations ordinaril the judgment mature mixed y have to jud have up gment to deal ( in spared of this that the special no it Master would pains case of be as ) the a rash with law Rolls on the er our , who to simp get part certainl to to question the pronounce y bottom seems , of from an a op question the inion lithograp leng adverse in th of which his to I I I I
, , y , purel tioning y tra the de strict inter justice ests an of d cus the toms judgment are concerne he pronounced d . With upon out , therefore the case as , for evolved a moment by himself ques- I I oi of jus his
from from the the mass mass of of evidence evidence before belore Jnm him . it it is is still still open open tor for us us to to suggest suggest the tne possiDiiity possibility I having affida affidavvits its formed he he frankly franklv that jud declared declared gment he he upon had had a not not , theory read read and and which did did the not not evidence care care for tor . of did did busin not not support support men , , . whose vur Our I I
limited issue . The space pith quite of forbids the whole our question attempting , however to go , into seems the to details have been of , the , Who complicated were hed the certain case m at ! j I I
o w id aers ings Messrs of lithograp pp Ward lied by hic & Mr stones Co . Vere the on actual which Foster cost , Messrs who price , . as Marcus t for hey the were Ward work put & done Co upon . had it the being lithograp stones understood , regularly and j I I I
pa agreed lete betwixt draw . ing Mr books . Foster b . and hatever Messrs . Marcus th Ward th & ht Co best . that The the , latter Master were of the to Rolls produce in I I
his made m comp axl l jud were were gment what what , ' seems - he called ral to have y w motlier mtrther formed - ii means .. e e the ... original original opinion ey that stones atones oug the and and stones . that that on tnese these which stones stones the drawings were were ¦ ¦ » never were c ,
printed from , but that , for printing purposes , , transfers , were , made to other stones fro ¦ m wlwca bC € B thactual printing done and he mentioned that these stones should ave I
preserve Ward W e ard & & d Co intact . . the the , as actual not was . virtua vial value valno lly the ; of property the the stones stones of Mr themselves themselves . Vere Foster , which which , subject it it appeared aDDeared to his pay naa had ¦ ¦ ing ^ iw Messn w — « n -
charged ho Foster was to , b after y be the subject having defendants to spent have . hundreds his He propert inferred of y poun d that estroye ds it in would d putting by having be valuable a monstrous these drawings drawings injustice upon rubbeu ¦ ¦ ¦ to ston J » o . » lv because he had not in the first instance few extra tihe ¦ value ¦ oi « -
simply simp stones themselves Decause lie , naa or sti not pula in ted by hrs special t instance agreement paia paid that a a tew the extra drawings shillings sniumgs shoul , , »« d be v *** mamta w ^ - . , ;(¦ the stones his undhiontrl such °
on as own property and wholly er s own co . On some gr | H as these the judge decided that the whole of the stones must be given up * nta ?* \ uim a |! - ill
injure perfectl d y to unbiassed Mr . Vere and Foster common . Now -sense , reall view y , of not the being case , practical it seems lithograp to us that her ¦ , s if , th ana JJlarcua e J ^ y » an | ^ [ | l ri / lit in Iiis premisesthe conclusion he to inevitable and if Messrs
wo & Co can . had hardl no y stronger suppose , that a cas , as e sensible for their cam men defence e , they was than would the ever one ; have thus dre presente amt ¦ ¦ had of d . contes by other th V i k jj ^ , J I
stronge case case at at r all all reasons . . Messrs Messrs for . . opposing Mn Marcus . iv . iin Warrl Mr Ward . Foster & Ar . Co C , c ' % . s , .. claim how however eve th r an , , harl had is , . here or or thought thnucrht stated . tney thev ¦ In ¦ ¦ the nw ' , fir coulo at p i ^ ie ^ under uuuoitj stand irtuiu them Liitsui to i / t » claim eiuiiii that Liiau these iue » e so » o--caii called « u . ' iiioiiUtj mother ' stones »¦ i / Oiiu » ' were were n wsu ot « and ***^ -- fo ordtW
affidavits preserved of intact artists ; that who , drew in fact the , they work were ori not inall ' not her on s sma tones ll stones at all . to They be ¦ trans put : ® * fr * ^^ m , I gy , , ¦
II mac bu rWlil t * hines on * ~ klr % large lalwa from printing nwin them ^ inrv all stones n 4 . /\ n They /\ n . ; and a further «> < 3 similarl n <> wiiAnl say that « y prove v >« , in n < TA those that ilial earlier long 1 ^ vn r * days editions *\ A % 4-1 rf of ^ r % a the were 1 I 7 A 1 chromo * A pn T > rlHW n , lltnc ? - v h iL gl V jap ^ h ^ ^ ltt M e ^ 1
M
-
-
Citation
-
Publishers’ Circular (1880-1890), Feb. 15, 1882, page 138, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/pc/issues/tec_15021882/page/2/
-